Suppr超能文献

字母、数字、符号和文字:如何传达证据等级和推荐意见。

Letters, numbers, symbols and words: how to communicate grades of evidence and recommendations.

作者信息

Schünemann Holger J, Best Dana, Vist Gunn, Oxman Andrew D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

出版信息

CMAJ. 2003 Sep 30;169(7):677-80.

Abstract

The GRADE Working Group is developing and evaluating a common, sensible approach to grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in health care. In this article, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using letters, numbers, symbols or words to represent grades of evidence and recommendations. Using multiple strategies, we searched for comparative studies of alternative ways of representing ordered categories in any context. In addition, we contacted experts and reviewed theoretical work and qualitative research on how best to communicate grades of any kind quickly and clearly. We were unable to identify health care research that addressed, either directly or indirectly, the best way to present grades of evidence and recommendations. We found examples of symbols used by government, commercial and consumer organizations to communicate quality of evidence or strength of recommendations, but no comparative studies. Although a number of grading systems are used in health care and other fields, there is little or no evidence of how well various presentations are understood. Before promoting the use of specific symbols, numbers, letters or words, the extent to which the intended message is comprehended should be evaluated.

摘要

GRADE工作组正在制定和评估一种通用、合理的方法,用于对医疗保健中证据的质量和推荐的强度进行分级。在本文中,我们讨论了使用字母、数字、符号或文字来表示证据等级和推荐等级的优缺点。我们运用多种策略,搜索了在任何背景下表示有序类别的替代方法的比较研究。此外,我们联系了专家,并查阅了关于如何以最佳方式快速、清晰地传达各类等级的理论著作和定性研究。我们未能找到直接或间接探讨呈现证据等级和推荐等级的最佳方式的医疗保健研究。我们发现了政府、商业和消费者组织用于传达证据质量或推荐强度的符号示例,但没有比较研究。尽管医疗保健和其他领域使用了多种分级系统,但几乎没有证据表明各种呈现方式的易懂程度如何。在推广使用特定的符号、数字、字母或文字之前,应评估预期信息的被理解程度。

相似文献

6
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
10
GRADE system: new paradigm.GRADE 系统:新模式。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Aug;10(4):377-83. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32833c148b.

引用本文的文献

9
Beyond Words: Enhancing Clinical Guideline Comprehension With Icons.言外之意:用图标增强临床指南的理解
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Oct 23;11(11):ofae637. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae637. eCollection 2024 Nov.

本文引用的文献

3
Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation.
Chest. 2001 Jan;119(1 Suppl):194S-206S. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.1_suppl.194s.
5
The effects of information framing on the practices of physicians.信息框架对医生行为的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Oct;14(10):633-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.09038.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验