• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤社会工作者对临终关怀护理的态度及转诊行为。

Oncology social workers' attitudes toward hospice care and referral behavior.

作者信息

Becker Janet E

机构信息

School of Social Work, Hunter College, New York, USA.

出版信息

Health Soc Work. 2004 Feb;29(1):36-45. doi: 10.1093/hsw/29.1.36.

DOI:10.1093/hsw/29.1.36
PMID:15024917
Abstract

Members of the Association of Oncology Social Workers completed a survey, which included the Hospice Philosophy Scale (HPS) assessing the likelihood of the worker referring a terminally ill patient to hospice, background and experience, and demographics. The respondents held overwhelmingly favorable attitudes toward hospice philosophy and care, yet the average proportion of terminally ill patients whom they referred to hospice was only 49.5 percent. The worker's HPS score was related significantly, although weakly, to the likelihood of referral. A follow-up study was undertaken to determine the reasons for the discrepancy between the workers' self-reported favorable attitudes toward hospice and their relatively low rate of patient referral. The factor identified most frequently was resistance from families because of the requirement that hospice patients discontinue active treatment.

摘要

肿瘤社会工作者协会的成员完成了一项调查,其中包括临终关怀理念量表(HPS),用于评估工作者将绝症患者转介至临终关怀机构的可能性、背景和经验以及人口统计学信息。受访者对临终关怀理念和护理持压倒性的积极态度,但他们转介至临终关怀机构的绝症患者平均比例仅为49.5%。工作者的HPS得分与转介可能性显著相关,尽管相关性较弱。随后进行了一项后续研究,以确定工作者自我报告的对临终关怀的积极态度与相对较低的患者转介率之间存在差异的原因。最常被提及的因素是家属的抵触,原因是临终关怀患者需要停止积极治疗。

相似文献

1
Oncology social workers' attitudes toward hospice care and referral behavior.肿瘤社会工作者对临终关怀护理的态度及转诊行为。
Health Soc Work. 2004 Feb;29(1):36-45. doi: 10.1093/hsw/29.1.36.
2
Consideration of hastening death among hospice patients and their families.临终关怀患者及其家属对加速死亡的思考。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004 Jun;27(6):523-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2003.10.010.
3
Referral of terminally ill patients for hospice: frequency and correlates.晚期绝症患者转诊至临终关怀机构:频率及相关因素
J Palliat Care. 2000 Winter;16(4):20-6.
4
US Physicians Overwhelmingly Endorse Hospice as the Better Option for Most Patients at the End of Life.美国医生压倒性地认可临终关怀是大多数患者临终时的更佳选择。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Jul;34(6):556-558. doi: 10.1177/1049909116636344. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
5
Nurses' communication of prognosis and implications for hospice referral: a study of nurses caring for terminally ill hospitalized patients.护士对预后的沟通及临终关怀转诊的影响:一项针对照料住院绝症患者的护士的研究。
Am J Crit Care. 2005 Jan;14(1):64-70.
6
Oregon hospice nurses and social workers' assessment of physician progress in palliative care over the past 5 years.俄勒冈州临终关怀护士和社会工作者对过去5年医生在姑息治疗方面进展的评估。
Palliat Support Care. 2003 Sep;1(3):215-9. doi: 10.1017/s1478951503030384.
7
Barriers to physicians' decisions to discuss hospice: insights gained from the United States hospice model.医生决定讨论临终关怀的障碍:从美国临终关怀模式中获得的见解。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2003 Aug;9(3):363-72. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00406.x.
8
Hospice care in Calgary: Survey of family physicians on their knowledge, experience, and attitudes.卡尔加里的临终关怀:家庭医生关于其知识、经验及态度的调查
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Aug;62(8):e484-94.
9
Social workers' participation in the resolution of ethical dilemmas in hospice care.社会工作者参与临终关怀中的伦理困境解决。
Health Soc Work. 2004 Feb;29(1):67-76. doi: 10.1093/hsw/29.1.67.
10
Factors that influence physicians' recommendation of hospice care: An exploratory study.影响医生推荐临终关怀的因素:一项探索性研究。
J Hosp Mark Public Relations. 2006;17(1):3-25. doi: 10.1300/J375v17n01_02.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of an intervention (PICASO) to optimise the palliative care capacity of social workers in Flanders: a study protocol based on phase I of the Medical Research Council framework.开发一项干预措施(PICASO)以优化佛兰德斯社会工作者的姑息治疗能力:基于医学研究委员会框架第一阶段的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 11;12(10):e060167. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060167.
2
How can social workers be meaningfully involved in palliative care? A scoping review on the prerequisites and how they can be realised in practice.社会工作者如何能够切实参与到姑息治疗中?一项关于先决条件以及如何在实践中实现这些条件的范围综述。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2021 Nov 30;15:26323524211058895. doi: 10.1177/26323524211058895. eCollection 2021.
3
Judgements about fellow professionals and the management of patients receiving palliative care in primary care: a qualitative study.
关于基层医疗中同行专业人员的评判以及接受姑息治疗患者的管理:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Apr;58(549):264-72. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08x279652.