• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会工作者参与临终关怀中的伦理困境解决。

Social workers' participation in the resolution of ethical dilemmas in hospice care.

作者信息

Csikai Ellen L

机构信息

School of Social Work, University of Alabama, Box 870314, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0314, USA.

出版信息

Health Soc Work. 2004 Feb;29(1):67-76. doi: 10.1093/hsw/29.1.67.

DOI:10.1093/hsw/29.1.67
PMID:15024920
Abstract

Ethical dilemmas are inherent in every health care setting. A sample of hospice social workers with no direct access to a hospice ethics committee (N = 110) was surveyed regarding ethical issues in hospice care, how the issues were managed, and the extent to which social workers participated in resolution of ethical dilemmas. Common issues discussed were the patients' medical condition, involvement of family, and family denial of terminal illness. Difficult cases were discussed most often in interdisciplinary team meetings. Social workers were most involved in traditional social work activities, such as providing knowledge of community resources and patients' psychosocial histories and promoting self-determination in policies.

摘要

伦理困境在每一个医疗环境中都根深蒂固。对110名无法直接接触临终关怀伦理委员会的临终关怀社会工作者进行了抽样调查,内容涉及临终关怀中的伦理问题、这些问题是如何处理的,以及社会工作者参与解决伦理困境的程度。讨论的常见问题包括患者的医疗状况、家属的参与情况以及家属对绝症的否认。疑难病例最常在跨学科团队会议上讨论。社会工作者最常参与传统的社会工作活动,比如提供社区资源和患者心理社会历史方面的知识,以及在政策方面促进自主决定。

相似文献

1
Social workers' participation in the resolution of ethical dilemmas in hospice care.社会工作者参与临终关怀中的伦理困境解决。
Health Soc Work. 2004 Feb;29(1):67-76. doi: 10.1093/hsw/29.1.67.
2
Ethical dilemmas faced by hospice social workers.临终关怀社会工作者面临的伦理困境。
Soc Work Health Care. 2014 Oct;53(9):950-68. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2014.950402.
3
An ethical dilemma in a hospice setting.临终关怀环境中的伦理困境。
Palliat Support Care. 2003 Mar;1(1):79-87. doi: 10.1017/s1478951503030013.
4
Oncology social workers' attitudes toward hospice care and referral behavior.肿瘤社会工作者对临终关怀护理的态度及转诊行为。
Health Soc Work. 2004 Feb;29(1):36-45. doi: 10.1093/hsw/29.1.36.
5
Exploring professional boundaries in end-of-life care: considerations for hospice social workers and other members of the team.探索临终关怀中的专业界限:临终关怀社会工作者及团队其他成员的考量
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2012;8(1):10-28. doi: 10.1080/15524256.2012.650671.
6
Ethical dilemmas of Israeli social workers.以色列社会工作者面临的伦理困境。
Int Soc Work. 2003 Jan;46(1):7-21. doi: 10.1177/0020872803046001590.
7
Examining ethical dilemmas as obstacles to hospice and palliative care for advanced cancer patients.审视伦理困境作为晚期癌症患者临终关怀与姑息治疗的障碍。
Cancer Invest. 2004;22(1):123-31. doi: 10.1081/cnv-120027587.
8
Health care social workers' views of ethical issues, practice, and policy in end-of-life care.医疗保健社会工作者对临终关怀中伦理问题、实践和政策的看法。
Soc Work Health Care. 2000;32(2):1-22. doi: 10.1300/j010v32n02_01.
9
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
10
In the clinic. Palliative care.在临床中。姑息治疗。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Feb 7;156(3):ITC2-1, TC2-2, TC2-3, TC2-4, TC2-5, TC2-6, TC2-7, TC2-8, TC2-9, TC2-10, TC2-11, TC2-12, TC2-13, TC2-14, TC2-15; quiz TC2-16. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-3-201202070-01002.

引用本文的文献

1
ExCEL in Social Work: Excellence in Cancer Education & Leadership: An Oncology Social Work Response to the 2008 Institute of Medicine Report.社会工作卓越计划:癌症教育与领导力卓越:肿瘤社会工作对2008年医学研究所报告的回应。
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Sep;30(3):503-13. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0717-8.
2
Predictors of ethical stress, moral action and job satisfaction in health care social workers.医疗保健社会工作者道德压力、道德行为和工作满意度的预测因素。
Soc Work Health Care. 2008;46(3):29-51. doi: 10.1300/J010v46n03_02.