Eisenberg R S
University of Michigan Law School, Ann Arbor 48109.
Science. 1992 Aug 14;257(5072):903-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1502556.
In the past year, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has filed patent applications on more than 2750 partial complementary DNA sequences of unknown function. The rationale for the filings--that patent protection may be necessary to ensure that private firms are willing to invest in developing related products--rests on two premises: first, that NIH may obtain patent rights that will offer effective product monopolies to licensee firms, and second, that unless NIH obtains these rights now, firms will be unable to obtain a comparable degree of exclusivity by other means, such as by obtaining patents on their own subsequent innovations. Neither premise is clearly wrong, although both are subject to doubt in view of statements from industry representatives that the NIH patenting strategy will deter rather than promote product development.
在过去一年里,美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)已就超过2750个功能未知的部分互补DNA序列提交了专利申请。提交这些申请的理由是——专利保护对于确保私营公司愿意投资开发相关产品可能是必要的——基于两个前提:第一,NIH可能获得专利权,这将为被许可公司提供有效的产品垄断权;第二,除非NIH现在获得这些权利,否则公司将无法通过其他方式获得同等程度的排他性,比如通过就其自身后续创新获得专利。这两个前提都并非明显错误,尽管鉴于行业代表称NIH的专利策略将阻碍而非促进产品开发的说法,这两个前提都值得怀疑。