Alcorn A, Berney T, Bretherton K, Mills M, Savery D, Shattock P
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Prudhoe Hospital, Prudhoe, UK.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2004 Mar;48(Pt 3):274-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2003.00554.x.
Although earlier claims to identify specific compounds in the urine of people with autism had been discredited, it was subsequently suggested that there might be biochemical characteristics that were specific to early childhood, particularly in those who also did not have a severe degree of intellectual disability This study was to establish whether autism might have a distinctive chromatographic profile on urinary analysis.
Thirty-four prepubertal boys with autism were matched with two groups of boys without autism--one on ability and chronological age and the other on chronological age alone, being within the normal range of ability. Laboratory analysis of their urine samples was carried out blind as to the clinical diagnosis.
The analysis correctly identified 53% of the autism group as against misidentifying 33% and 18% of the other two groups. When children with a severe learning disability (both with and without autism) were excluded from the comparisons, the laboratory then identified 77% of the 13 boys left in the autism group and misidentified 8% and 18% of the other two groups.
The results would support the idea of a biological marker in prepubertal children and that it may be absent in, or obscured by the presence of severe LD.
尽管早期关于在自闭症患者尿液中识别特定化合物的说法已被证明不可信,但随后有人提出,可能存在特定于幼儿期的生化特征,尤其是在那些没有严重智力残疾的幼儿中。本研究旨在确定自闭症在尿液分析中是否可能具有独特的色谱特征。
34名青春期前患有自闭症的男孩与两组没有自闭症的男孩进行匹配——一组在能力和实际年龄上匹配,另一组仅在实际年龄上匹配,其能力在正常范围内。对他们的尿液样本进行实验室分析时,对临床诊断情况保密。
分析正确识别出53%的自闭症组儿童,而错误识别另外两组中的33%和18%。当将有严重学习障碍(包括有和没有自闭症)的儿童排除在比较范围之外时,实验室随后识别出自闭症组中剩下的13名男孩中的77%,并错误识别另外两组中的8%和18%。
这些结果支持青春期前儿童存在生物标志物的观点,并且该生物标志物可能在严重学习障碍的儿童中不存在或被其掩盖。