• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性病护理中的结果研究重点：私人购买者视角

Outcomes research priorities in chronic care: a private purchaser perspective.

作者信息

Salber Patricia R

机构信息

Blue Shield of California, San Francisco, California 94105, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2004 Apr;42(4 Suppl):III6-10. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000119501.92485.05.

DOI:10.1097/01.mlr.0000119501.92485.05
PMID:15026665
Abstract

Private purchasers would benefit from outcomes research in chronic care that could inform their purchasing activities, including benefit design decisions. This article presents 1 purchaser's perspective on 10 areas of research of interest to the purchasing community.

摘要

私人购买者将从慢性病护理的结果研究中受益，这些研究可为他们的购买活动提供信息，包括福利设计决策。本文呈现了一位购买者对购买群体感兴趣的10个研究领域的看法。

相似文献

1
Outcomes research priorities in chronic care: a private purchaser perspective.慢性病护理中的结果研究重点：私人购买者视角
Med Care. 2004 Apr;42(4 Suppl):III6-10. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000119501.92485.05.
2
How healthcare systems shape a purchaser's strategies and actions when managing chronic care.医疗保健系统如何影响购买者在管理慢性病护理时的策略和行动。
Health Policy. 2020 Jun;124(6):628-638. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 May 11.
3
Orchestration versus bookkeeping: How stakeholder pressures drive a healthcare purchaser's institutional logics.协调与簿记：利益相关者压力如何推动医疗保健购买者的制度逻辑。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 13;16(10):e0258337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258337. eCollection 2021.
4
Containing health care costs--a critical test of the public-private joint venture in health.控制医疗保健成本——对医疗卫生领域公私合营的一项关键考验。
West J Med. 1980 May;132(5):424-9.
5
Outcomes research--it's not just for academic medicine.结果研究——它不仅仅适用于学术医学领域。
Med Group Manage J. 1994 May-Jun;41(3):16, 18, 62 passim.
6
An Overview of Value, Perspective, and Decision Context-A Health Economics Approach: An ISPOR Special Task Force Report [2].价值、视角与决策背景概述——一种卫生经济学方法：ISPOR 特别工作组报告 [2]
Value Health. 2018 Feb;21(2):124-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.006.
7
The role of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) in improving outcomes of care.医疗保健政策与研究机构（AHCPR）在改善医疗结果方面的作用。
Nurs Clin North Am. 1997 Sep;32(3):521-42.
8
Health care in America: a purchaser's perspective.
Times. 1980 Mar;21(3):13-4.
9
Research in long-term care: issues, dilemmas, and challenges from the public purchaser's perspective.
Med Care. 2004 Apr;42(4 Suppl):III11-8.
10
The costs and benefits of enhanced depression care to employers.加强抑郁症护理对雇主的成本与收益。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;63(12):1345-53. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.12.1345.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients with complex chronic conditions: Health care use and clinical events associated with access to a patient portal.患有复杂慢性病的患者：与获得患者门户相关的医疗保健使用和临床事件。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 19;14(6):e0217636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217636. eCollection 2019.
2
Measuring the quality of care provided to community dwelling vulnerable elders dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid.衡量为同时参加医疗保险和医疗补助计划的社区弱势老年人提供的护理质量。
Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10):931-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318127143e.