Zingmond David S, Wilber Kathleen H, Maclean Catherine H, Wenger Neil S
Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10):931-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318127143e.
Small studies suggest that the quality of healthcare provided to older patients needs improvement. However, measuring the quality of care for larger groups of older adults is difficult.
To measure the quality of care in a community-dwelling vulnerable geriatric population using administrative data to apply quality indicators (QIs) from the Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders project.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cohort study of community-dwelling dual enrollees in Medicare and Medicaid, age 75 years and older, living in 19 California counties in 1999 and 2000.
Measurement of care provided for 43 QIs by condition (eg, heart failure) and by intervention type (eg, medication use), and identification of care inaccessible to measurement by linked Medicare and Medicaid claims.
A total of 43 out of 230 QIs were captured using linked claims data. The 100,528 patients triggered 930,753 QIs (9.3 QIs/person). The overall QI pass rate (ie, successful receipt of care) was 65%. QIs with the highest pass rates measured avoidance of adverse medications and appropriate medication use. Fewer than half of the QIs were passed for ischemic heart disease, stroke, and osteoporosis. Few QIs aimed at geriatric care could be measured and none assessed counseling, history taking, or information continuity.
The use of claims data-derived quality-of-care process measures is feasible for the vulnerable older population, but requires development of data elements focused on geriatric care. QIs that could be applied to the older patients included in this study identified several areas of care that need improvement.
小规模研究表明,为老年患者提供的医疗服务质量有待提高。然而,衡量更大规模老年人群的护理质量具有难度。
利用行政数据应用脆弱老年人护理评估项目的质量指标(QIs),以衡量社区居住的脆弱老年人群的护理质量。
设计、地点和参与者:对1999年和2000年居住在加利福尼亚州19个县的年龄在75岁及以上的医疗保险和医疗补助双重参保的社区居民进行队列研究。
按病情(如心力衰竭)和干预类型(如药物使用)对43项质量指标的护理情况进行测量,并通过医疗保险和医疗补助的关联索赔确定无法测量的护理情况。
使用关联索赔数据捕获了230项质量指标中的43项。100,528名患者触发了930,753项质量指标(每人9.3项质量指标)。总体质量指标通过率(即成功接受护理率)为65%。通过率最高的质量指标衡量的是避免不良药物使用和合理用药。缺血性心脏病、中风和骨质疏松症的质量指标通过率不到一半。针对老年护理的质量指标很少能够测量,且没有一项评估咨询、病史采集或信息连续性。
对于脆弱的老年人群,使用基于索赔数据的护理质量过程指标是可行的,但需要开发侧重于老年护理的数据元素。本研究中适用于老年患者的质量指标确定了几个需要改进的护理领域。