• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Measuring the quality of care provided to community dwelling vulnerable elders dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid.衡量为同时参加医疗保险和医疗补助计划的社区弱势老年人提供的护理质量。
Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10):931-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318127143e.
2
Measuring the quality of care provided to dually enrolled Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries living in nursing homes.衡量为入住疗养院的同时参加医疗保险和医疗补助计划的受益人群提供的护理质量。
Med Care. 2009 May;47(5):536-44. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318190cd8b.
3
Association of claims-based quality of care measures with outcomes among community-dwelling vulnerable elders.基于索赔的护理质量措施与社区弱势老年人结局的相关性研究。
Med Care. 2011 Jun;49(6):553-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31820e5aab.
4
Appropriateness of quality indicators for older patients with advanced dementia and poor prognosis.针对晚期痴呆且预后不良老年患者的质量指标的适宜性
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Jul;51(7):902-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.513331.x.
5
Quality of Care Provided by a Comprehensive Dementia Care Comanagement Program.综合痴呆症护理共同管理项目所提供的护理质量。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Aug;64(8):1724-30. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14251. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
6
The quality of medical care provided to vulnerable community-dwelling older patients.为社区居住的弱势老年患者提供的医疗服务质量。
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Nov 4;139(9):740-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-9-200311040-00008.
7
Using assessing care of vulnerable elders quality indicators to measure quality of hospital care for vulnerable elders.运用脆弱老年人护理质量评估指标来衡量医院对脆弱老年人的护理质量。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Nov;55(11):1705-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01444.x.
8
[Quality of ambulatory medical care in the context of age and care-dependency: Results of a cross-sectional analysis of German health claims data].[年龄与护理依赖背景下的门诊医疗质量:德国健康保险数据的横断面分析结果]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020 Sep;155:17-28. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
9
Relationship between quality of care and functional decline in hospitalized vulnerable elders.住院弱势老年人的护理质量与功能衰退之间的关系。
Med Care. 2009 Aug;47(8):895-901. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181a7e3ec.
10
Quality of Care Delivered Before vs After a Quality-Improvement Intervention for Acute Geriatric Trauma.急性老年创伤质量改进干预前后提供的护理质量
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 May;220(5):820-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.041. Epub 2015 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality Indicators for High-Need Patients: a Systematic Review.高需求患者的质量指标:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Sep;37(12):3147-3161. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07454-z. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
2
Assessing quality of care of elderly patients using the ACOVE quality indicator set: a systematic review.使用 ACOVE 质量指标集评估老年患者的护理质量:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028631. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
3
Association of claims-based quality of care measures with outcomes among community-dwelling vulnerable elders.基于索赔的护理质量措施与社区弱势老年人结局的相关性研究。
Med Care. 2011 Jun;49(6):553-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31820e5aab.
4
Provision of preventive health care in systemic lupus erythematosus: data from a large observational cohort study.系统性红斑狼疮的预防保健提供:来自大型观察队列研究的数据。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(3):R84. doi: 10.1186/ar3011. Epub 2010 May 12.
5
Quality of care for heart failure among disabled Medicaid recipients with and without severe mental illness.有/无严重精神疾病的残疾 Medicaid 受助人的心力衰竭护理质量。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010 May-Jun;32(3):255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
6
Measuring the quality of care provided to dually enrolled Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries living in nursing homes.衡量为入住疗养院的同时参加医疗保险和医疗补助计划的受益人群提供的护理质量。
Med Care. 2009 May;47(5):536-44. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318190cd8b.
7
A comparison of how generalists and fellowship-trained geriatricians provide "geriatric" care.通科医生和接受过专科培训的老年病医生提供“老年病”护理方式的比较。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Oct;56(10):1807-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01942.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Variations on a theme called PACE.名为PACE主题的变体。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006 Jul;61(7):689-93. doi: 10.1093/gerona/61.7.689.
2
Comparison of administrative data and medical records to measure the quality of medical care provided to vulnerable older patients.比较行政数据和医疗记录以衡量为弱势老年患者提供的医疗服务质量。
Med Care. 2006 Feb;44(2):141-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000196960.12860.de.
3
Unmet long-term care needs: an analysis of Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibles.未满足的长期护理需求:对医疗保险-医疗补助双重资格者的分析。
Inquiry. 2005 Summer;42(2):171-82. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_42.2.171.
4
The quality of care under a managed-care program for dual eligibles.针对双重资格者的管理式医疗计划下的护理质量。
Gerontologist. 2005 Aug;45(4):496-504. doi: 10.1093/geront/45.4.496.
5
Care in U.S. hospitals--the Hospital Quality Alliance program.美国医院的护理——医院质量联盟计划。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 21;353(3):265-74. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa051249.
6
Medicare program; Medicare prescription drug benefit; interpretation. Final rule; interpretation.医疗保险计划;医疗保险处方药福利;解释。最终规则;解释。
Fed Regist. 2005 Mar 21;70(53):13397-400.
7
Measurement challenges in developing the national healthcare quality report and the national healthcare disparities report.制定国家医疗质量报告和国家医疗差异报告时面临的测量挑战。
Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3 Suppl):I17-23. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503001-00004.
8
Medicaid payment and risk-adjusted nursing home quality measures.医疗补助支付与风险调整后的养老院质量指标。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Sep-Oct;23(5):243-52. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.5.243.
9
A comprehensive clinical assessment tool to inform policy and practice: applications of the minimum data set.一种为政策和实践提供信息的综合临床评估工具:最小数据集的应用
Med Care. 2004 Apr;42(4 Suppl):III50-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000120104.01232.5e.
10
Outcomes research priorities in chronic care: a private purchaser perspective.慢性病护理中的结果研究重点:私人购买者视角
Med Care. 2004 Apr;42(4 Suppl):III6-10. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000119501.92485.05.

衡量为同时参加医疗保险和医疗补助计划的社区弱势老年人提供的护理质量。

Measuring the quality of care provided to community dwelling vulnerable elders dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid.

作者信息

Zingmond David S, Wilber Kathleen H, Maclean Catherine H, Wenger Neil S

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10):931-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318127143e.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318127143e
PMID:17890990
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2849015/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Small studies suggest that the quality of healthcare provided to older patients needs improvement. However, measuring the quality of care for larger groups of older adults is difficult.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the quality of care in a community-dwelling vulnerable geriatric population using administrative data to apply quality indicators (QIs) from the Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders project.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cohort study of community-dwelling dual enrollees in Medicare and Medicaid, age 75 years and older, living in 19 California counties in 1999 and 2000.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Measurement of care provided for 43 QIs by condition (eg, heart failure) and by intervention type (eg, medication use), and identification of care inaccessible to measurement by linked Medicare and Medicaid claims.

RESULTS

A total of 43 out of 230 QIs were captured using linked claims data. The 100,528 patients triggered 930,753 QIs (9.3 QIs/person). The overall QI pass rate (ie, successful receipt of care) was 65%. QIs with the highest pass rates measured avoidance of adverse medications and appropriate medication use. Fewer than half of the QIs were passed for ischemic heart disease, stroke, and osteoporosis. Few QIs aimed at geriatric care could be measured and none assessed counseling, history taking, or information continuity.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of claims data-derived quality-of-care process measures is feasible for the vulnerable older population, but requires development of data elements focused on geriatric care. QIs that could be applied to the older patients included in this study identified several areas of care that need improvement.

摘要

背景

小规模研究表明,为老年患者提供的医疗服务质量有待提高。然而,衡量更大规模老年人群的护理质量具有难度。

目的

利用行政数据应用脆弱老年人护理评估项目的质量指标(QIs),以衡量社区居住的脆弱老年人群的护理质量。

设计、地点和参与者:对1999年和2000年居住在加利福尼亚州19个县的年龄在75岁及以上的医疗保险和医疗补助双重参保的社区居民进行队列研究。

主要结局指标

按病情(如心力衰竭)和干预类型(如药物使用)对43项质量指标的护理情况进行测量,并通过医疗保险和医疗补助的关联索赔确定无法测量的护理情况。

结果

使用关联索赔数据捕获了230项质量指标中的43项。100,528名患者触发了930,753项质量指标(每人9.3项质量指标)。总体质量指标通过率(即成功接受护理率)为65%。通过率最高的质量指标衡量的是避免不良药物使用和合理用药。缺血性心脏病、中风和骨质疏松症的质量指标通过率不到一半。针对老年护理的质量指标很少能够测量,且没有一项评估咨询、病史采集或信息连续性。

结论

对于脆弱的老年人群,使用基于索赔数据的护理质量过程指标是可行的,但需要开发侧重于老年护理的数据元素。本研究中适用于老年患者的质量指标确定了几个需要改进的护理领域。