• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当分层因素为聚类大小时,比较整群随机试验中的完全随机设计和分层随机设计:一项模拟研究。

Comparing completely and stratified randomized designs in cluster randomized trials when the stratifying factor is cluster size: a simulation study.

作者信息

Lewsey J D

机构信息

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2004 Mar 30;23(6):897-905. doi: 10.1002/sim.1665.

DOI:10.1002/sim.1665
PMID:15027079
Abstract

Stratified randomized designs are popular in cluster randomized trials (CRTs) because they increase the chance of the intervention groups being well balanced in terms of identified prognostic factors at baseline and may increase statistical power. The objective of this paper is to assess the gains in power obtained by stratifying randomization by cluster size, when cluster size is associated with an important cluster level factor which is otherwise unaccounted for in data analysis. A simulation study was carried out using a CRT where UK general practices were the randomized units as a template. The results show that when cluster size is strongly associated with a cluster level factor which is predictive of outcome, the stratified randomized design has superior power results to the completely randomized design and that the superiority is related to the number of clusters.

摘要

分层随机设计在整群随机试验(CRT)中很常见,因为它们增加了干预组在基线时根据已确定的预后因素实现良好平衡的机会,并且可能提高统计效能。本文的目的是评估在整群大小与一个重要的整群水平因素相关联(而该因素在数据分析中否则未被考虑)时,通过按整群大小对随机化进行分层所获得的效能提升。使用以英国全科医疗作为随机单位的CRT作为模板进行了一项模拟研究。结果表明,当整群大小与一个可预测结局的整群水平因素密切相关时,分层随机设计比完全随机设计具有更优的效能结果,并且这种优越性与整群数量有关。

相似文献

1
Comparing completely and stratified randomized designs in cluster randomized trials when the stratifying factor is cluster size: a simulation study.当分层因素为聚类大小时,比较整群随机试验中的完全随机设计和分层随机设计:一项模拟研究。
Stat Med. 2004 Mar 30;23(6):897-905. doi: 10.1002/sim.1665.
2
Sample size calculations for 3-level cluster randomized trials.三级整群随机试验的样本量计算
Clin Trials. 2008;5(5):486-95. doi: 10.1177/1740774508096476.
3
Sample size calculator for cluster randomized trials.整群随机试验的样本量计算器。
Comput Biol Med. 2004 Mar;34(2):113-25. doi: 10.1016/S0010-4825(03)00039-8.
4
Sample size re-estimation in cluster randomization trials.整群随机试验中的样本量重新估计
Stat Med. 2002 May 30;21(10):1337-50. doi: 10.1002/sim.1121.
5
Comparison of tests for categorical data from a stratified cluster randomized trial.分层整群随机试验中分类数据检验方法的比较
Stat Med. 2002 Dec 30;21(24):3835-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.1256.
6
Cluster randomized controlled trials in primary care: an introduction.初级保健中的整群随机对照试验:引言
Eur J Gen Pract. 2006;12(2):70-3. doi: 10.1080/13814780600780627.
7
A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.整群随机试验中组内相关系数置信区间方法的比较
Stat Med. 2002 Dec 30;21(24):3757-74. doi: 10.1002/sim.1330.
8
Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.整群随机试验中连续缺失结局的插补策略。
Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):329-45. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200710423.
9
The effect of cluster randomization on sample size in prevention research.整群随机化对预防研究样本量的影响。
J Fam Pract. 2001 Mar;50(3):W241-6.
10
Issues in the meta-analysis of cluster randomized trials.整群随机试验的Meta分析中的问题。
Stat Med. 2002 Oct 15;21(19):2971-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.1301.

引用本文的文献

1
Sample size considerations for stratified cluster randomization design with binary outcomes and varying cluster size.分层聚类随机化设计中具有二分类结局和变簇大小的样本量考虑。
Stat Med. 2019 Aug 15;38(18):3395-3404. doi: 10.1002/sim.8175. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
2
Efficacy of a Community-Based Physical Activity Program KM2H2 for Stroke and Heart Attack Prevention among Senior Hypertensive Patients: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Phase-II Trial.基于社区的身体活动计划KM2H2对老年高血压患者预防中风和心脏病发作的疗效:一项整群随机对照II期试验。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 1;10(10):e0139442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139442. eCollection 2015.
3
Evidence-based care of older people with suspected cognitive impairment in general practice: protocol for the IRIS cluster randomised trial.
基于证据的全科医学中疑似认知障碍老年人的护理:IRIS 集群随机试验方案。
Implement Sci. 2013 Aug 19;8:91. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-91.
4
A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of repeated cross-sectional cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.对不同方法分析具有二元结局的重复横断面整群随机试验的统计效能进行比较。
Int J Biostat. 2010 Mar 29;6(1):Article 11. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1179.
5
A pragmatic cluster randomized trial evaluating the impact of a community pharmacy intervention on statin adherence: rationale and design of the Community Pharmacy Assisting in Total Cardiovascular Health (CPATCH) study.一项评价社区药房干预对他汀类药物依从性影响的实用集群随机试验:社区药房协助全面心血管健康(CPATCH)研究的原理和设计。
Trials. 2010 Jul 8;11:76. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-76.
6
Sample size considerations when groups are the appropriate unit of analysis.当分组是合适的分析单位时的样本量考量。
Appl Nurs Res. 2007 Aug;20(3):152-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2006.02.004.