Suppr超能文献

T1b-T3N0M0期前列腺癌采用内分泌治疗联合或不联合根治性前列腺切除术。

Endocrine therapy with or without radical prostatectomy for T1b-T3N0M0 prostate cancer.

作者信息

Homma Yukio, Akaza Hideyuki, Okada Kiyoki, Yokoyama Masao, Usami Michiyuki, Hirao Yoshihiko, Tsushima Tomoyasu, Sakamoto Atsuhiko, Ohashi Yasuo, Aso Yoshio

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Urol. 2004 Apr;11(4):218-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2003.00781.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We retrospectively compared the 5-year survival rates of T1b-T3N0M0 prostate cancer patients treated either by endocrine therapy plus radical prostatectomy or endocrine therapy alone.

METHODS

Clinical T1b-T3N0M0 prostate cancer patients were enrolled at 104 institutions in Japan. They were assigned to study 1 (n = 176), if they were indicated to prostatectomy, if not indicated, they were assigned to study 2 (n = 151). The indication of prostatectomy was based on the clinical judgement of physicians and/or patients. Those assigned to study 1 underwent prostatectomy and adjuvant endocrine therapy with or without preoperative androgen deprivation. Those assigned to study 2 were treated with leuprorelin acetate with or without chlormadinone acetate. They were followed-up every 3 months until death or for 5 years and over.

RESULTS

Those assigned to study 1 were younger (mean age 67.2 vs 75.7 years), less advanced in clinical stage, and had lower prostate specific antigen levels (mean 43.8 vs 103.6 ng/mL). Death for any reason was observed less frequently in study 1 (n = 29, 16%) than study 2 (n = 50, 33%), and the 5-year overall survival rate was higher in study 1 (87 vs. 68%). However, prostate cancer deaths were comparatively seldom (9% in study 1 and 7% in study 2), resulting in the identical 5-year cause specific survival rate in both study groups (91%). In both study groups the overall survival was almost equal to the natural survival of age-matched men.

CONCLUSIONS

Endocrine therapy offers a reasonable survival rate in T1b-T3 prostate cancer patients within a 5-year follow-up. Observation will be extended to determine 10-year outcomes.

摘要

背景

我们回顾性比较了接受内分泌治疗联合根治性前列腺切除术或单纯内分泌治疗的T1b-T3N0M0前列腺癌患者的5年生存率。

方法

日本104家机构纳入了临床T1b-T3N0M0前列腺癌患者。如果患者适合前列腺切除术,则被分配到研究1组(n = 176);如果不适合,则被分配到研究2组(n = 151)。前列腺切除术的指征基于医生和/或患者的临床判断。分配到研究1组的患者接受了前列腺切除术及辅助内分泌治疗,术前可进行或不进行雄激素剥夺。分配到研究2组的患者接受醋酸亮丙瑞林治疗,可联合或不联合醋酸氯地孕酮。每3个月对患者进行随访,直至死亡或满5年及以上。

结果

分配到研究1组的患者更年轻(平均年龄67.2岁对75.7岁),临床分期更轻,前列腺特异性抗原水平更低(平均43.8 ng/mL对103.6 ng/mL)。研究1组因任何原因死亡的发生率(n = 29,16%)低于研究2组(n = 50,33%),研究1组的5年总生存率更高(87%对68%)。然而,前列腺癌死亡相对较少(研究1组为9%,研究2组为7%),导致两组的5年病因特异性生存率相同(91%)。在两个研究组中,总生存率几乎与年龄匹配男性的自然生存率相等。

结论

在5年随访期内,内分泌治疗为T1b-T3前列腺癌患者提供了合理的生存率。将延长观察期以确定10年的结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验