Swanson Gregory P
University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MC 7889, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Curr Urol Rep. 2006 May;7(3):225-32. doi: 10.1007/s11934-006-0025-x.
Locally advanced prostate cancer is a treatment dilemma. As with prostate cancer in general, there is no clear evidence that aggressive intervention (ie, surgery or radiation) is superior to noninvasive interventions (eg, delayed treatment or androgen ablation). Because patients with locally advanced prostate cancer have a high risk of local and systemic recurrence, there is some argument to proceed with androgen ablation as the sole modality of treatment. The data using this approach are limited, but an understanding of the degree and duration of response is helpful in selecting patients for primary androgen ablation.
局部晚期前列腺癌是一个治疗难题。与一般的前列腺癌一样,没有明确证据表明积极干预(即手术或放疗)优于非侵入性干预(如延迟治疗或雄激素剥夺)。由于局部晚期前列腺癌患者有较高的局部和全身复发风险,因此有人主张将雄激素剥夺作为唯一的治疗方式。采用这种方法的数据有限,但了解反应的程度和持续时间有助于选择接受初始雄激素剥夺治疗的患者。