Suppr超能文献

[亚甲蓝染色内镜检查用于巴雷特食管诊断]

[Methylene blue chromoendoscopy for Barrett's esophagus diagnosis].

作者信息

Saporiti Marcela Rocha Loures, Almada e Souza Raquel Canzi de, Pisani Júlio César, Amarante Heda Maria Barska dos Santos, Carmes Eliane Ribeiro, Sakamoto Danielle Giacometti

机构信息

Disciplina de Gastroenterologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Brazil.

出版信息

Arq Gastroenterol. 2003 Jul-Sep;40(3):139-47. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032003000300002. Epub 2004 Mar 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Barrett's esophagus is a condition in which the normal stratified squamous epithelium of the esophagus is replaced by specialized intestinal metaplasia, that carries an increased risk for the development of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Dysplasia and initial stage carcinoma generally precede this neoplasm; the increased risk has led to attempts at early detection of these lesions through periodic upper endoscopy and biopsies. The continued rise in the incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus has fueled resurgent interest in the use of a variety of endoscopic techniques, like methylene blue chromoendoscopy, to improve the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus and associated complications.

AIM

To determine if methylene blue chromoendoscopy directed biopsies offer advantage over the conventional technique in the detection of Barrett's esophagus.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Forty-five patients with previous diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus were enrolled in this study; all of them underwent upper endoscopy with random biopsies and upper endoscopy with methylene-blue directed biopsies within 4 weeks, in the period between April and October, 2002.

RESULTS

Results of histologic examination of random biopsies and those of methylene blue directed biopsies were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 62,5%, 15,4%, 57,7% and 18,2%, respectively. No significant differences were found in the total number of biopsy specimens. Differences were found in the total amount of time spent during each procedure (chromoendoscopy x conventional technique), with chromoendoscopy being significantly longer.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that methylene blue chromoendoscopy offered no advantage over the conventional method in the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus.

摘要

背景

巴雷特食管是一种食管正常的复层鳞状上皮被特殊的肠化生上皮取代的疾病,其患食管腺癌的风险增加。发育异常和早期癌通常先于这种肿瘤出现;风险增加促使人们尝试通过定期上消化道内镜检查和活检来早期发现这些病变。食管腺癌发病率的持续上升引发了人们对使用各种内镜技术(如亚甲蓝染色内镜检查)以改善巴雷特食管及其相关并发症诊断的新兴趣。

目的

确定亚甲蓝染色内镜引导下活检在巴雷特食管检测中是否比传统技术更具优势。

材料与方法

45例先前诊断为巴雷特食管的患者纳入本研究;在2002年4月至10月期间,所有患者在4周内分别接受了随机活检的上消化道内镜检查和亚甲蓝引导活检的上消化道内镜检查。

结果

比较随机活检和亚甲蓝引导活检的组织学检查结果。敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为62.5%、15.4%、57.7%和18.2%。活检标本总数无显著差异。两种检查方法(染色内镜检查与传统技术)的总耗时存在差异,染色内镜检查明显更长。

结论

我们得出结论,在巴雷特食管的诊断中,亚甲蓝染色内镜检查并不比传统方法更具优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验