• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区获得性肺炎:管理措施对住院时间的影响

Community-acquired pneumonia: influence of management practices on length of hospital stay.

作者信息

Laing R, Coles C, Chambers S, Frampton C, Jennings L, Karalus N, Mills G, Town G I

机构信息

Canterbury Respiratory Research Group, New Zealand.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2004 Mar;34(3):91-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0903.2004.00544.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1444-0903.2004.00544.x
PMID:15030455
Abstract

AIMS

To identify variation in the management of -community-acquired pneumonia between two New Zealand hospitals and the factors that may account for any differences.

METHODS

A 12-month, prospective two-centre study was conducted. Between July 1999 and July 2000, 474 adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia were enrolled: 304 in Christchurch Hospital and 170 in Waikato Hospital. The patients were similar in age, sex, prior antibiotic use and comorbidity. There was no significant difference in the clinical outcomes for the patients at the two centres.

RESULTS

The mean duration of i.v. antibiotic therapy was 1.7 versus 3.0 days (P < 0.001) and length of stay (LOS) was 3.0 versus 5.9 days (P < 0.001) for Waikato and Christchurch Hospitals, respectively. Using multivariate analysis, we could account for 61% of the observed variation in LOS. Duration of i.v. antibiotic therapy independently accounted for 16% of variation in LOS compared with age (2%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, duration of fever, intensive care unit admission and centre of admission (all <1%). For the duration of i.v. antibiotics, centre of admission, largely reflecting clinician practice at each centre, independently accounted for 13% of variation, compared with duration of fever (5%), admission to the Intensive Care Unit (4%), Pneumonia Severity Index score (3%) and bacteraemia (3%).

CONCLUSION

Of the identifiable factors, variations in clinician behaviour outweighed the influence of patient factors on the duration of i.v. antibiotic therapy, which in turn was the major determinant of LOS for patients hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia. An early switch from i.v. to oral antibiotic therapy in conjunction with early discharge planning may significantly reduce LOS without compromising patient outcomes.

摘要

目的

确定新西兰两家医院在社区获得性肺炎管理方面的差异以及可能导致这些差异的因素。

方法

进行了一项为期12个月的前瞻性双中心研究。在1999年7月至2000年7月期间,纳入了474例社区获得性肺炎成年患者:克赖斯特彻奇医院304例,怀卡托医院170例。患者在年龄、性别、既往抗生素使用情况和合并症方面相似。两个中心患者的临床结局无显著差异。

结果

怀卡托医院和克赖斯特彻奇医院静脉抗生素治疗的平均持续时间分别为1.7天和3.0天(P<0.001),住院时间分别为3.0天和5.9天(P<0.001)。通过多变量分析,我们可以解释观察到的住院时间差异的61%。与年龄(2%)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、发热持续时间、重症监护病房入住情况和入院中心(均<1%)相比,静脉抗生素治疗持续时间独立解释了住院时间差异的16%。对于静脉抗生素治疗持续时间,入院中心在很大程度上反映了每个中心的临床医生实践,独立解释了13%的差异,而发热持续时间(5%)、入住重症监护病房(4%)、肺炎严重程度指数评分(3%)和菌血症(3%)的解释比例较低。

结论

在可识别的因素中,临床医生行为的差异对静脉抗生素治疗持续时间的影响超过了患者因素,而静脉抗生素治疗持续时间又是社区获得性肺炎住院患者住院时间的主要决定因素。早期从静脉抗生素治疗改为口服抗生素治疗并结合早期出院计划,可能在不影响患者结局的情况下显著缩短住院时间。

相似文献

1
Community-acquired pneumonia: influence of management practices on length of hospital stay.社区获得性肺炎:管理措施对住院时间的影响
Intern Med J. 2004 Mar;34(3):91-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0903.2004.00544.x.
2
Treatment and outcomes of community-acquired pneumonia at Canadian hospitals.加拿大医院社区获得性肺炎的治疗与转归
CMAJ. 2000 May 16;162(10):1415-20.
3
Early switch to oral antibiotics and early discharge guidelines in the management of community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎管理中早期改用口服抗生素及早期出院指南
Respirology. 2007 Jan;12(1):111-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.00931.x.
4
Efficacy of exclusively oral antibiotic therapy in patients hospitalized with nonsevere community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective study and meta-analysis.单纯口服抗生素治疗非重症社区获得性肺炎住院患者的疗效:一项回顾性研究和荟萃分析。
Am J Med. 2004 Mar 15;116(6):385-93. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.11.013.
5
Azithromycin monotherapy for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: a 31/2-year experience from a veterans affairs hospital.阿奇霉素单药治疗社区获得性肺炎住院患者:一家退伍军人事务医院3.5年的经验
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jul 28;163(14):1718-26. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.14.1718.
6
Impact of guideline-concordant empiric antibiotic therapy in community-acquired pneumonia.指南一致的经验性抗生素治疗对社区获得性肺炎的影响
Am J Med. 2006 Oct;119(10):865-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.02.014.
7
Timing of antibiotic administration and outcomes for Medicare patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia.医疗保险参保的社区获得性肺炎住院患者抗生素给药时机与治疗结果
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Mar 22;164(6):637-44. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.6.637.
8
Comparison of processes and outcomes of pneumonia care between hospitalists and community-based primary care physicians.住院医师与社区基层医疗医生在肺炎治疗过程及结果方面的比较。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2002 Oct;77(10):1053-8. doi: 10.4065/77.10.1053.
9
Community-acquired pneumonia in Christchurch and Waikato 1999-2000: microbiology and epidemiology.1999 - 2000年克赖斯特彻奇和怀卡托地区的社区获得性肺炎:微生物学与流行病学
N Z Med J. 2001 Nov 9;114(1143):488-92.
10
Association between timing of intensive care unit admission and outcomes for emergency department patients with community-acquired pneumonia.急诊科社区获得性肺炎患者重症监护病房入住时机与预后的关联
Crit Care Med. 2009 Nov;37(11):2867-74. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b02dbb.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Outcomes of Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients Discharged from General Medicine and Respiratory Units in Australia: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.比较澳大利亚普通内科和呼吸科出院的社区获得性肺炎患者的结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
J Clin Med. 2024 May 20;13(10):3001. doi: 10.3390/jcm13103001.
2
Variation in clinical outcomes and process of care measures in community acquired pneumonia: a systematic review.社区获得性肺炎临床结局及护理过程指标的差异:一项系统评价
Pneumonia (Nathan). 2020 Sep 25;12:10. doi: 10.1186/s41479-020-00073-4. eCollection 2020.
3
Health care-associated pneumonia in the intensive care unit: Guideline-concordant antibiotics and outcomes.
重症监护病房中与医疗保健相关的肺炎:符合指南的抗生素与治疗结果
J Crit Care. 2016 Dec;36:265-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
4
Modern Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Is It Cost-Effective and are Outcomes Acceptable?社区获得性肺炎的现代管理:是否具有成本效益,且结果是否可接受?
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2011 Jun;13(3):269-77. doi: 10.1007/s11908-011-0178-8.
5
Discharge Delay in Patients with Community-acquired Pneumonia Managed on a Critical Pathway.社区获得性肺炎患者在关键路径管理下的出院延迟。
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2006 Mar;17(2):109-13. doi: 10.1155/2006/375645.
6
Severe community acquired pneumonia.重症社区获得性肺炎
BMJ. 2006 Dec 9;333(7580):1181-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39050.672639.80.
7
Factors associated with length of stay in hospital for suspected community-acquired pneumonia.疑似社区获得性肺炎患者住院时间的相关因素。
Can Respir J. 2006 Sep;13(6):317-24. doi: 10.1155/2006/325087.