Bulux J, Carranza E, Castañeda C, Solomons N W, Sokoll L J, Morrow F D, Russell R M
Center for Studies of Sensory Impairment, Aging and Metabolism (CESSIAM), Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Am J Clin Nutr. 1992 Sep;56(3):543-7. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/56.3.543.
We investigated the time course and the reproducibility of the relative-dose-response (RDR) test for assessing vitamin A status in older adults. The maximum plasma retinol response to 480 retinol equivalents (RE) of retinyl palmitate in abnormal responses was at 6 or 7 h after dosing compared with the 5-h sampling interval recommended by others for younger adults and children. With respect to reproducibility, the diagnostic concordance of two RDR tests at 7-d intervals in 14 elders was 71%. In 29% of tests, one test was abnormal and the other normal. Linear regression of the two RDR values in these 14 subjects gave a correlation coefficient of -0.08. We conclude that the procedure for the RDR should be modified when applied to persons greater than 60 y of age, and that multiple repetitions of the test are needed to provide a stable indication of vitamin A stores in an elderly individual.
我们研究了用于评估老年人维生素A状况的相对剂量反应(RDR)试验的时间进程和可重复性。在异常反应中,给予480视黄醇当量(RE)的棕榈酸视黄酯后,血浆视黄醇的最大反应出现在给药后6或7小时,而其他人推荐的针对年轻人和儿童的采样间隔为5小时。关于可重复性,14名老年人每隔7天进行的两次RDR试验的诊断一致性为71%。在29%的试验中,一次试验异常而另一次正常。这14名受试者两次RDR值的线性回归得到的相关系数为-0.08。我们得出结论,当应用于60岁以上人群时,RDR试验程序应进行修改,并且需要多次重复试验才能为老年个体的维生素A储备提供稳定的指标。