Suppr超能文献

我们如何评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病中诱发呼吸困难的感知?

[How can we assess the perception of induced dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?].

作者信息

Martínez Francés M E, Perpiñá Tordera M, Belloch Fuster A, Martínez Moragón E M, de Diego Damiá A

机构信息

Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Arch Bronconeumol. 2004 Apr;40(4):149-54.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate various methods for studying the perception of dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using a new parameter, the change in Borg scale rating, and others already in use: the linear regression slope and the application of Stevens' law to the response perception curve--ie change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (delta FEV1)--change in dyspnea (delta dyspnea).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A bronchial challenge test was performed on 70 patients with stable COPD and no contraindications for performing the test (European Respiratory Society criteria), during which dyspnea was measured (Borg scale) after each nebulization. Perception was analyzed using: a) the linear regression slope of delta FEV1 plotted against (delta dyspnea); b) the exponent n of Stevens' law (psi=k phi n, in which psi is delta dyspnea and phi is delta FEV1, with perception being poor when n<1 and good when n>1), and c) change in Borg: difference between dyspnea when FEV1 has fallen 20% and dyspnea after saline inhalation. Subjects were classified according to the slope and change in Borg as hypoperceivers, normal perceivers, or hyperperceivers. These 2 methods of classification were compared using the kappa statistic.

RESULTS

According to the exponent n, all patients were hypoperceivers (n<1). According to the slope, there were 33 hypoperceivers, 28 normal perceivers, and 9 hyperperceivers. The change in Borg classified 37 subjects as hypoperceivers, 23 as normal perceivers, and 10 as hyperperceivers. All except 5 subjects were classified in the same way by the slope and the change in Borg (kappa=0.88). In most of the 5 cases of discrepancy, the slope classified subjects as better perceivers.

CONCLUSIONS

The n exponent is not valid for evaluating the perception of dyspnea induced by a bronchial challenge test in COPD. Change in Borg is at least as useful as the slope for evaluating perception of dyspnea. The percentage of patients with this disease who are hyperperceivers is high.

摘要

目的

使用一个新参数(Borg量表评分变化)以及其他已在使用的参数(线性回归斜率和将史蒂文斯定律应用于反应感知曲线——即一秒用力呼气量变化(ΔFEV1)——呼吸困难变化(Δ呼吸困难))来评估研究慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中呼吸困难感知的各种方法。

患者与方法

对70例稳定期COPD且无该检查禁忌证(欧洲呼吸学会标准)的患者进行支气管激发试验,试验过程中每次雾化后测量呼吸困难程度(Borg量表)。使用以下方法分析感知情况:a)绘制ΔFEV1与(Δ呼吸困难)的线性回归斜率;b)史蒂文斯定律指数n(ψ = kφ^n,其中ψ为Δ呼吸困难,φ为ΔFEV1,n < 1时感知较差,n > 1时感知良好),以及c)Borg量表变化:FEV1下降20%时的呼吸困难程度与吸入盐水后的呼吸困难程度之差。根据斜率和Borg量表变化将受试者分为感知减退者、正常感知者或感知增强者。使用kappa统计量比较这两种分类方法。

结果

根据指数n,所有患者均为感知减退者(n < 1)。根据斜率,有33例感知减退者、28例正常感知者和9例感知增强者。Borg量表变化将37例受试者分类为感知减退者、23例为正常感知者、10例为感知增强者。除5例受试者外,所有受试者根据斜率和Borg量表变化的分类方式相同(kappa = 0.88)。在这5例存在差异的病例中,大多数情况下斜率将受试者分类为感知更好者。

结论

指数n对于评估COPD患者支气管激发试验诱导的呼吸困难感知无效。Borg量表变化在评估呼吸困难感知方面至少与斜率一样有用。该疾病中感知增强者的比例较高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验