Etxeberria Guridi José Francisco
Universidad del País Vasco/EHU, San Sebastián, España.
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 2003 Jul-Dec(19):109-25.
French regulations related to "genetic prints" and its later incorporation to an automatized file in the frame of the penal process, initially deserved (1998) a positive judgement due to the guarantees surrounding such techniques, considering that with its use an interference was made with the freedom and rights of the individual. This primary regulation is watching a legislative evolution that brings serious doubts about the current guarantee system. A couple of legal reforms with security as their main axis (2001 and 2003) give more importance to the "genetic print" file by extending the causes in which it starts functioning going against the proportionality that must be observed when freedoms and rights of the individual can be affected.
法国有关“基因指纹”的法规以及其后来在刑事诉讼框架内被纳入自动化档案的情况,最初(1998年)由于围绕此类技术的保障措施而得到了肯定的判决,因为当时认为其使用对个人的自由和权利造成了干涉。这一最初的法规正关注着一场立法演变,这场演变对当前的保障体系引发了严重质疑。以安全为主要轴心的几项法律改革(2001年和2003年)通过扩大“基因指纹”档案开始运作的情形,更加重视该档案,这有悖于在可能影响个人自由和权利时必须遵守的相称性原则。