• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于一个讨论小组对公众在捐赠肾脏分配优先级偏好的研究的说明。

A note on a discussion group study of public preferences regarding priorities in the allocation of donor kidneys.

作者信息

Dolan Paul, Shaw Rebecca

机构信息

Sheffield Health Economics Group, University of Sheffield, S1 4DA Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2004 Apr;68(1):31-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.07.006.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.07.006
PMID:15033550
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether and how people wish to give differential priority based on certain characteristics of the potential recipient of a donor kidney.

DESIGN

A random sample of people resident in York was invited to attend two focus group meetings each, a fortnight apart.

SETTING

The City of York.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-three randomly chosen people meeting in four groups of five or six.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Those factors that people think should be taken into account when allocating donor kidneys, in addition to the expected benefits from transplantation.

RESULTS

People are willing and able to distinguish between potential recipients of a kidney transplantation according to a range of characteristics beyond the expected benefits from treatment. There is a clear consensus across the four groups that one of the most important considerations is what will happen to the patient without treatment, and so priority is given to those with a poor prognosis. There is also a strong view that priority should be given to younger patients and to those with dependants. The time spent waiting for a transplant is also important, but less so.

CONCLUSIONS

A sample of the general public, after discussion and debate, wish to take account of a number of patient characteristics when allocating donor kidneys. There is some degree of consensus about what these factors should be and this suggests that it might be possible to develop a set of guidelines for the allocation of donor kidneys.

摘要

目的

探讨人们是否以及如何希望根据潜在肾脏捐献接受者的某些特征给予不同的优先权。

设计

邀请居住在约克的人员随机样本参加两个焦点小组会议,每组会议间隔两周。

地点

约克市

参与者

随机选择的23人,分四组,每组五六人。

主要观察指标

除了移植预期益处之外,人们认为在分配肾脏捐献时应考虑的因素。

结果

人们愿意且能够根据治疗预期益处之外的一系列特征区分肾脏移植的潜在接受者。四组人员达成明确共识,其中一个最重要的考虑因素是患者未经治疗会怎样,因此优先考虑预后较差的患者。也有一种强烈观点认为应优先考虑年轻患者和有家属的患者。等待移植的时间也很重要,但重要性稍低。

结论

经过讨论和辩论,普通公众样本在分配肾脏捐献时希望考虑一些患者特征。对于这些因素应该是什么存在一定程度的共识,这表明有可能制定一套肾脏捐献分配指南。

相似文献

1
A note on a discussion group study of public preferences regarding priorities in the allocation of donor kidneys.关于一个讨论小组对公众在捐赠肾脏分配优先级偏好的研究的说明。
Health Policy. 2004 Apr;68(1):31-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.07.006.
2
Public preferences for donor kidney allocation: a study in Iran.公众对供体肾脏分配的偏好:伊朗的一项研究。
Clin Transplant. 2013 Sep-Oct;27(5):718-23. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12207. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
3
Selection criteria for recipients of scarce donor livers: a public opinion survey in Hong Kong.稀缺供体肝脏受者的选择标准:香港的一项民意调查。
Hong Kong Med J. 2006 Feb;12(1):40-6.
4
Community preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: a discrete choice study.社区对移植供体器官分配的偏好:一项离散选择研究。
Transplantation. 2015 Mar;99(3):560-7. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000365.
5
Community values and preferences in transplantation organ allocation decisions.移植器官分配决策中的社区价值观和偏好
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Mar;52(6):853-61. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00187-8.
6
The economic implications of HLA matching in cadaveric renal transplantation.尸体肾移植中HLA配型的经济影响
N Engl J Med. 1999 Nov 4;341(19):1440-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199911043411906.
7
How well do members of the public deal with a distributive justice problem in health care?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004 Jan;9(1):7-13. doi: 10.1258/135581904322716058.
8
Are there better guidelines for allocation in liver transplantation? A novel score targeting justice and utility in the model for end-stage liver disease era.在肝移植中是否有更好的分配指南?一种针对终末期肝病模型时代的正义和效用的新评分。
Ann Surg. 2011 Nov;254(5):745-53; discussion 753. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182365081.
9
Factors influencing outcome after deceased heart beating donor kidney transplantation in the United Kingdom: an evidence base for a new national kidney allocation policy.影响英国脑死亡供体肾移植后结局的因素:新国家肾脏分配政策的证据基础。
Transplantation. 2010 Feb 27;89(4):379-86. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181c90287.
10
A note on the relative importance that people attach to different factors when setting priorities in health care.关于人们在确定医疗保健优先事项时对不同因素所赋予的相对重要性的一则说明。
Health Expect. 2003 Mar;6(1):53-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00210.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Adding epitope compatibility to deceased donor kidney allocation criteria: recommendations from a pan-Canadian online public deliberation.为已故供者肾脏分配标准增加表位相容性:来自全加在线公众讨论的建议。
BMC Nephrol. 2023 Jun 9;24(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12882-023-03224-z.
2
Public values and guiding principles for implementing epitope compatibility in kidney transplantation allocation criteria: results from a Canadian online public deliberation.公共价值观和指导原则在肾移植分配标准中实施表位相容性:来自加拿大在线公众讨论的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 10;23(1):844. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15790-w.
3
Israeli Medical Experts' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Preferences in Allocating Donor Organs for Transplantation.
以色列医学专家在器官分配移植方面的知识、态度和偏好。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 6;19(11):6945. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116945.
4
The Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources: A Comparative Study From Jordan.稀缺医疗资源的公平分配:来自约旦的比较研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jan 12;7:603406. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.603406. eCollection 2020.
5
Attitudes, knowledge, and preferences of the Israeli public regarding the allocation of donor organs for transplantation.以色列公众对捐赠器官用于移植的态度、知识和偏好。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2020 May 4;9(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13584-020-00376-3.
6
Public preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: Focus group discussions.公众对捐赠器官用于移植的分配偏好:焦点小组讨论。
Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):670-680. doi: 10.1111/hex.13047. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
7
Systematic Review of Public Preferences for the Allocation of Donor Organs for Transplantation: Principles of Distributive Justice.系统评价公众对器官捐赠移植分配的偏好:分配正义原则。
Patient. 2019 Oct;12(5):475-489. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00363-0.
8
Patient preferences, knowledge and beliefs about kidney allocation: qualitative findings from the UK-wide ATTOM programme.患者对肾脏分配的偏好、知识和信念:英国全国性ATTOM项目的定性研究结果
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 27;7(1):e013896. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013896.
9
Organ allocation for liver transplantation according to the public opinion.根据公众意见进行肝移植的器官分配。
Hepat Mon. 2012 Aug;12(8):e6183. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.6183. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
10
Societal values in the allocation of healthcare resources: is it all about the health gain?社会价值观在医疗资源配置中的作用:是否全在于健康收益?
Patient. 2011;4(4):207-25. doi: 10.2165/11588880-000000000-00000.