Jongbloet P H
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hum Reprod. 2004 Apr;19(4):769-74. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh136. Epub 2004 Feb 12.
Current hypotheses do not explain the concerns about sex ratio modulation at conception, birth or during life, and particularly about sex ratio reversal, e.g. at very young or advanced maternal age, during 'anovulatory seasons', among those of low socio-economic status, or induced by specific lifestyles, etc. These modulations are explained by the introduction of the ovopathy concept and inherent preferential fertilization of non-optimally matured oocytes by Y-bearing sperm. Non-optimal development and implantation of male-biased fetuses results in perennial loss of non-optimal, male-biased fetuses before and after birth. Accumulation of conceptopathology in extreme conditions entrains an increasing male to female ratio and ultimately a decreasing one, i.e. an 'inverted dose-response gradient' or 'dose-response fallacy'.
当前的假说无法解释人们对受孕时、出生时或生命过程中性别比例调节的担忧,尤其是性别比例逆转的情况,例如在母亲年龄非常小或很大时、在“无排卵季节”、在社会经济地位较低的人群中,或由特定生活方式引起时等。通过引入卵子病变的概念以及携带Y染色体的精子对未达到最佳成熟度的卵子进行内在的优先受精,可以解释这些调节现象。男性偏向胎儿的非最佳发育和着床导致在出生前后非最佳、男性偏向胎儿的常年损失。在极端情况下,概念病理学的积累导致男女比例增加,最终又导致比例下降,即“倒置的剂量反应梯度”或“剂量反应谬误”。