Ray Chester A, Wilson Thad E
Department of Medicine, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033-2390, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Jul;97(1):160-4. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00699.2003. Epub 2004 Mar 19.
Measurement of skin sympathetic nerve activity (SSNA) during isometric exercise has been previously limited to handgrip. We hypothesized that isometric leg exercise due to the greater muscle mass of the leg would elicit greater SSNA responses than arm exercise because of presumably greater central command and muscle mechanoreceptor activation. To compare the effect of isometric arm and leg exercise on SSNA and cutaneous end-organ responses, 10 subjects performed 2 min of isometric knee extension (IKE) and handgrip (IHG) at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction followed by 2 min of postexercise muscle ischemia (PEMI) in a normothermic environment. SSNA was recorded from the peroneal nerve. Cutaneous vascular conductance (laser-Doppler flux/mean arterial pressure) and electrodermal activity were measured within the field of cutaneous afferent discharge. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure significantly increased by 16 +/- 3 and 23 +/- 3 beats/min and by 22 +/- 2 and 27 +/- 3 mmHg from baseline during IHG and IKE, respectively. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure responses were significantly greater during IKE compared with IHG. SSNA increased significantly and comparably during IHG and IKE (52 +/- 20 and 50 +/- 13%, respectively). During PEMI, SSNA and heart rate returned to baseline, whereas mean arterial pressure remained significantly elevated (Delta12 +/- 2 and Delta13 +/- 2 mmHg from baseline for IHG and IKE, respectively). Neither cutaneous vascular conductance nor electrodermal activity was significantly altered by either exercise or PEMI. These results indicate that, despite cardiovascular differences in response to IHG and IKE, SSNA responses are similar at the same exercise intensity. Therefore, the findings suggest that relative effort and not muscle mass is the main determinant of exercise-induced SSNA responses in humans.
此前,等长运动期间皮肤交感神经活动(SSNA)的测量仅限于握力测试。我们推测,由于腿部肌肉量更大,等长腿部运动相比手臂运动可能会引发更强的SSNA反应,这大概是因为中枢指令和肌肉机械感受器激活程度更高。为比较等长手臂运动和腿部运动对SSNA及皮肤终末器官反应的影响,10名受试者在常温环境下,以最大自主收缩的30%进行2分钟的等长伸膝(IKE)和握力(IHG)运动,随后进行2分钟的运动后肌肉缺血(PEMI)。从腓神经记录SSNA。在皮肤传入放电区域内测量皮肤血管传导率(激光多普勒血流/平均动脉压)和皮肤电活动。与基线相比,IHG和IKE期间心率和平均动脉压分别显著增加16±3和23±3次/分钟,以及22±2和27±3 mmHg。与IHG相比,IKE期间心率和平均动脉压反应显著更大。IHG和IKE期间SSNA均显著且同等程度增加(分别为52±20%和50±13%)。在PEMI期间,SSNA和心率恢复到基线水平,而平均动脉压仍显著升高(IHG和IKE分别比基线升高12±2和13±2 mmHg)。运动或PEMI均未显著改变皮肤血管传导率或皮肤电活动。这些结果表明,尽管对IHG和IKE的心血管反应存在差异,但在相同运动强度下SSNA反应相似。因此,研究结果表明,相对努力程度而非肌肉量是人类运动诱导SSNA反应的主要决定因素。