Suppr超能文献

[Comparative study of cefpiramide + amikacin versus piperacillin + amikacin in granulocytopenic patients: a randomized, prospective study].

作者信息

Sampi K, Hattori M

机构信息

Hematology Clinic, Saitama Cancer Center, Japan.

出版信息

Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1992 Aug;19(9):1315-20.

PMID:1503486
Abstract

Cefpiramide + amikacin (CPM + AMK) was compared in a prospective randomized trial with our standard regimen of piperacillin plus amikacin (PIPC + AMK) as an empiric therapy for fever in 252 episodes of 141 patients with granulocytopenia. Initial profound granulocytopenia (fewer than 100/mm3 mature granulocytes) was present in approximately 69% of the patient trials in both treatment groups. Both groups were equally distributed in regard to age, disease, pretreatment WBC count and duration of antibiotic treatment, although septic shock was more frequently seen in CPM + AMK. Responses to PIPC + AMK and CPM + AMK were similar for microbiologically and clinically documented infection, while the response rate for clinically documented infections treated with PIPC + AMK was superior to CPM + AMK (63% vs. 52%). Patients with persistent granulocytopenia of less than 100/mm3 of mature granulocytes without a rise during therapy responded significantly less in both groups (22% vs. 9%) than those in whom the granulocyte count rose (79% vs. 79%). Toxicities of jaundice or disordered hepatic function test were infrequent in both groups. Disordered renal function test occurred in one case in PIPC + AMK groups.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验