Fenu S, Raccah R, Santilli S, Micozzi A, Girmena C, Martino P, Avvisati G
Cattedra di Ematologia, Università degli studi La Sapienza, Roma, Italy.
Chemioterapia. 1988 Oct;7(5):323-6.
Seventy-six consecutive neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies, admitted to the "Department of Hematology" of Rome between March and September 1986, were randomly assigned to receive either piperacillin (300 mg/kg in four divided doses) or ceftazidime (100 mg/kg in four divided doses) plus amikacin (15 mg/kg in two divided doses) whenever they developed a febrile episode (temperature greater than 38 degrees C thrice over 12 hours, not related to drugs or transfusions, or else temperature greater than 38.5 degrees C). After 72 hours of antibiotic therapy, in case of persistent fever, piperacillin or ceftazidime was added to the ceftazidime + amikacin or piperacillin + amikacin combination, respectively. The antibiotic treatment was, however, modified according to in vitro susceptibility if a positive culture was present. Success without regimen modification was observed in both antibiotic combinations in 52.6% of cases. Considering the empiric cross of antibiotics, the response rate reached 78%. Neither toxicity nor side effects were observed in the reported groups. Considering blood isolates, we observed a greater incidence of gram-positive organisms compared with gram-negatives (28 cases vs 5 cases, 84.7% vs 15.3% respectively). Fungal infections were documented in four cases, two in each group. Even though no statistical difference was found between the two groups as far as patients not responding to the first antibiotic combination are concerned, piperacillin seems to have had more efficacy (twelve patients responding to the addition of piperacillin vs seven patients responding to the addition of ceftazidime). Piperacillin + amikacin seems to be as effective as ceftazidime + amikacin in the empirical therapy of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients.
1986年3月至9月期间,罗马“血液科”收治的76例连续性血液系统恶性肿瘤中性粒细胞减少患者,在出现发热性发作(12小时内体温三次超过38摄氏度,与药物或输血无关,或体温超过38.5摄氏度)时,被随机分配接受哌拉西林(300mg/kg,分四次给药)或头孢他啶(100mg/kg,分四次给药)加阿米卡星(15mg/kg,分两次给药)。抗生素治疗72小时后,若仍持续发热,则分别在头孢他啶+阿米卡星或哌拉西林+阿米卡星组合中加入哌拉西林或头孢他啶。然而,如果培养结果呈阳性,则根据体外药敏试验调整抗生素治疗方案。两种抗生素组合中,52.6%的病例在未调整治疗方案的情况下取得成功。考虑到抗生素的经验性交叉使用,有效率达到78%。在报告的组中未观察到毒性或副作用。就血液分离株而言,我们观察到革兰氏阳性菌的发生率高于革兰氏阴性菌(分别为28例对5例,84.7%对15.3%)。有4例记录到真菌感染,每组各2例。尽管就对第一种抗生素组合无反应的患者而言,两组之间未发现统计学差异,但哌拉西林似乎疗效更佳(12例患者在加用哌拉西林后有反应,而7例患者在加用头孢他啶后有反应)。在中性粒细胞减少患者发热性发作的经验性治疗中,哌拉西林+阿米卡星似乎与头孢他啶+阿米卡星一样有效。