Komssi S, Huttunen J, Aronen H J, Ilmoniemi R J
Helsinki Brain Research Center, Helsinki, Finland.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Mar;115(3):534-42. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.10.034.
Dipole models, which are frequently used in attempts to solve the electromagnetic inverse problem, require explicit a priori assumptions about the cerebral current sources. This is not the case for solutions based on minimum-norm estimates. In the present study, we evaluated the spatial accuracy of the L2 minimum-norm estimate (MNE) in realistic noise conditions by assessing its ability to localize sources of evoked responses at the primary somatosensory cortex (SI).
Multichannel somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and magnetic fields (SEFs) were recorded in 5 subjects while stimulating the median and ulnar nerves at the left wrist. A Tikhonov-regularized L2-MNE, constructed on a spherical surface from the SEP signals, was compared with an equivalent current dipole (ECD) solution obtained from the SEFs.
Primarily tangential current sources accounted for both SEP and SEF distributions at around 20 ms (N20/N20m) and 70 ms (P70/P70m), which deflections were chosen for comparative analysis. The distances between the locations of the maximum current densities obtained from MNE and the locations of ECDs were on the average 12-13 mm for both deflections and nerves stimulated. In accordance with the somatotopical order of SI, both the MNE and ECD tended to localize median nerve activation more laterally than ulnar nerve activation for the N20/N20m deflection. Simulation experiments further indicated that, with a proper estimate of the source depth and with a good fit of the head model, the MNE can reach a mean accuracy of 5 mm in 0.2-microV root-mean-square noise.
When compared with previously reported localizations based on dipole modelling of SEPs, it appears that equally accurate localization of S1 can be obtained with the MNE.
MNE can be used to verify parametric source modelling results. Having a relatively good localization accuracy and requiring minimal assumptions, the MNE may be useful for the localization of poorly known activity distributions and for tracking activity changes between brain areas as a function of time.
偶极子模型常用于求解电磁逆问题,它需要对脑电流源做出明确的先验假设。基于最小范数估计的解决方案则并非如此。在本研究中,我们通过评估其在初级体感皮层(SI)定位诱发反应源的能力,来评价L2最小范数估计(MNE)在实际噪声条件下的空间准确性。
在5名受试者左手腕刺激正中神经和尺神经时,记录多通道体感诱发电位(SEPs)和磁场(SEFs)。将基于SEP信号在球面上构建的Tikhonov正则化L2-MNE与从SEFs获得的等效电流偶极子(ECD)解进行比较。
在约20 ms(N20/N20m)和70 ms(P70/P70m)时,主要的切向电流源同时解释了SEP和SEF分布,选择这些偏转进行对比分析。对于两种偏转和所刺激的神经,从MNE获得的最大电流密度位置与ECD位置之间的平均距离为12 - 13 mm。根据SI的躯体感觉顺序,对于N20/N20m偏转,MNE和ECD都倾向于将正中神经激活定位在比尺神经激活更外侧的位置。模拟实验进一步表明,通过对源深度进行适当估计并良好拟合头部模型,MNE在0.2微伏均方根噪声下可达到5 mm的平均精度。
与先前报道的基于SEP偶极子建模的定位相比,似乎使用MNE可以获得同样准确的S1定位。
MNE可用于验证参数源建模结果。MNE具有相对较好的定位准确性且所需假设最少,可能有助于定位未知的活动分布,并跟踪脑区之间随时间变化的活动情况。