Vanbrabant Peter, Dhondt Erwin, Sabbe Marc
Emergency Department, University Hospital Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Resuscitation. 2004 Feb;60(2):163-70. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2003.08.012.
To determine our knowledge in terms of cause of death and quality of death certification about patients who die in the emergency department. To establish the role of autopsy in this matter.
Retrospective chart review of all patients dying in an academic emergency department (ED) of a tertiary hospital over a period of 1 year.
One hundred and ninety-six patients died in the ED in 1998. In 141/196 patients the cause of death could be determined on clinical grounds. In 53/196 patients, the antemortem clinical diagnosis was unknown. Twenty-nine out of 53 patients underwent autopsy. In all but one patient autopsy revealed the cause of death. After retrospective analysis of all patient data (notes, biology, radiology and pathological investigation), the major causes of death were cardiac (19.4%), cerebral (non-traumatic) (16.8%), trauma (15.3%) and unknown (13.3%). In the patient group with sudden cardiac arrest of unclear origin, the postmortem cause of death was identified as cardiac (51.7%), non-traumatic bleeding (10.3%), infectious (10.3%) and pulmonary embolism (3.4%). In the group of patients with a clinically clear cause of death, who underwent autopsy, 14 class II findings according to the Goldman's classification of autopsy diagnoses (i.e. major diagnosis whose detection would not have altered therapy nor outcome) were found in 16 patients. No class I findings (i.e. major diagnosis whose detection would have altered therapy or outcome) were noted. Altogether, major discrepancies between the antemortem presumed cause of death according to the notes and the real cause of death was found in 15.3%.
Autopsy remains a very important tool to establish the cause of death in patients dying in ED. The concordance between the antemortem presumed cause of death recorded in the patient notes and the real cause (all patient data) is poor.
确定我们对于在急诊科死亡患者的死因及死亡证明质量的了解情况。确定尸检在此方面的作用。
对一家三级医院学术急诊科1年内所有死亡患者的病历进行回顾性审查。
1998年有196名患者在急诊科死亡。141/196例患者的死因可根据临床情况确定。53/196例患者生前临床诊断不明。53例患者中有29例接受了尸检。除1例患者外,尸检均揭示了死因。在对所有患者数据(病历、生物学检查、放射学检查和病理学检查)进行回顾性分析后,主要死因包括心脏疾病(19.4%)、脑部(非创伤性)疾病(16.8%)、创伤(15.3%)和不明原因(13.3%)。在心脏骤停原因不明的患者组中,尸检确定的死因包括心脏疾病(51.7%)、非创伤性出血(10.3%)、感染性疾病(10.3%)和肺栓塞(3.4%)。在临床死因明确且接受尸检的患者组中,根据戈德曼尸检诊断分类(即主要诊断的发现不会改变治疗方案或结果),16例患者中有14例为II类发现。未发现I类发现(即主要诊断的发现会改变治疗方案或结果)。总体而言,根据病历记录的生前推定死因与实际死因之间的主要差异为15.3%。
尸检仍然是确定在急诊科死亡患者死因的非常重要的工具。患者病历中记录的生前推定死因与实际死因(所有患者数据)之间的一致性较差。