Silfvast Tom, Takkunen Olli, Kolho Elina, Andersson Leif C, Rosenberg Per
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, PO Box 340, 00029 Helsinki, Finland.
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Feb;29(2):321-4. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1576-z. Epub 2002 Nov 30.
To characterise discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in patients who die in the intensive care unit.
Retrospective chart review.
Ten-bed closed mixed adult intensive care unit in a tertiary referral teaching hospital.
All the clinical notes and autopsy reports of 346 patients who died in the intensive care unit in 1996-2000.
Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses were reviewed by two intensivists, a specialist in infectious diseases, a pathologist and an anaesthesiologist. New findings which would have changed current therapy in the intensive care unit were categorised as a Class I discrepancy, and those related to death but which would not have altered therapy as a Class II discrepancy.
Of 2370 patients admitted, 388 (16.4%) died. An autopsy was performed in 346 (89%) of the deceased patients. A Class I discrepancy was found in 8 patients (2.3%) and a Class II discrepancy in 11 patients (3.2%). Five of the eight (62%) Class I discrepancies were infections which occurred in patients already treated for another infections.
Despite the availability of advanced diagnostic facilities, especially infectious complications seem to remain undiagnosed. Autopsy is a valuable tool with which to monitor diagnostic accuracy in these patients.
明确在重症监护病房死亡患者的临床诊断与尸检诊断之间的差异。
回顾性病历审查。
一家三级转诊教学医院的拥有10张床位的封闭式混合成人重症监护病房。
1996年至2000年在重症监护病房死亡的346例患者的所有临床记录和尸检报告。
两名重症监护医生、一名传染病专家、一名病理学家和一名麻醉师对临床诊断与尸检诊断之间的差异进行审查。可能改变重症监护病房当前治疗方案的新发现被归类为I类差异,与死亡相关但不会改变治疗方案的发现被归类为II类差异。
在2370例入院患者中,388例(16.4%)死亡。346例(89%)死亡患者进行了尸检。8例(2.3%)患者存在I类差异,11例(3.2%)患者存在II类差异。8例I类差异中有5例(62%)为感染,发生在已因另一种感染接受治疗的患者身上。
尽管有先进的诊断设备,但特别是感染性并发症似乎仍未被诊断出来。尸检是监测这些患者诊断准确性的一项有价值的工具。