Suppr超能文献

环孢素加氯喹与环孢素加安慰剂治疗早发型类风湿关节炎的随机、双盲、多中心对照临床试验

A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled clinical trial of cyclosporine plus chloroquine vs. cyclosporine plus placebo in early-onset rheumatoid arthritis.

作者信息

Miranda Juan M, Alvarez-Nemegyei José, Saavedra Miguel A, Terán Leobardo, Galván-Villegas Federico, García-Figueroa José, Jara Luis J, Barile Leonor

机构信息

Departamento de Reumatología, Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional La Raza, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

Arch Med Res. 2004 Jan-Feb;35(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2003.07.008.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine-A (CsA) plus chloroquine (Clq) in early-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared to CsA plus placebo.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, 12-month follow-up, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of CsA (2.5-5 mg/kg/day[d]) plus Clq (150 mg/d) vs. CsA plus placebo in active RA of <2 years of evolution.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients were included; 111 patients (74.4%) completed the 12-month follow-up period. Evaluation at 6 and 12 months showed improvement for all clinical disease parameters. In both groups there was a decrease in tender joint count, swollen joint count, pain, assessment of efficacy by both investigator and patient, functional assessment, and morning stiffness, all differences statistically significant. With an intention-to-treat analysis, there was 64% in the CsA plus Clq group (CsA/Clq) and 63% in the CsA plus placebo group (CsA/Plac) at 12 months in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-20 criteria of improvement. Response rate for ACR-50 was 48 and 47%, and for ACR-70 it was 29% in both groups; the difference was not statistically significant between study groups. Gastrointestinal complaints were common in both groups. Four patients in CsA/Clq group and five patients in CsA/placebo group increased creatinine levels; two patients in each group discontinued treatment due to this reason.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no advantage to adding chloroquine to cyclosporine in patients with RA.

摘要

背景

我们的目的是评估与环孢素A(CsA)加安慰剂相比,环孢素A(CsA)联合氯喹(Clq)治疗早发性类风湿关节炎(RA)的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性、为期12个月随访的多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,比较CsA(2.5 - 5mg/kg/天[d])联合Clq(150mg/天)与CsA联合安慰剂治疗病程小于2年的活动性RA的效果。

结果

共纳入149例患者;111例患者(74.4%)完成了12个月的随访期。6个月和12个月时的评估显示所有临床疾病参数均有改善。两组的压痛关节数、肿胀关节数、疼痛、研究者和患者的疗效评估、功能评估以及晨僵均有所下降,所有差异均有统计学意义。在意向性分析中,12个月时,CsA联合Clq组(CsA/Clq)达到美国风湿病学会(ACR)-20改善标准的比例为64%,CsA联合安慰剂组(CsA/Plac)为63%。ACR-50的缓解率在两组中分别为48%和47%,ACR-70的缓解率在两组中均为29%;研究组之间差异无统计学意义。两组胃肠道不适均常见。CsA/Clq组有4例患者、CsA/安慰剂组有5例患者肌酐水平升高;每组各有2例患者因此停药。

结论

对于RA患者,在环孢素中添加氯喹并无优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验