Gibofsky Allan, Rodrigues Jude, Fiechtner Justus, Berger Manuela, Pan Sharon
Department of Medicine and Public Health, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York 10021, USA.
Clin Ther. 2007 Jun;29(6):1071-85. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.06.016.
This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of the cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitor valdecoxib with the nonselective NSAID naproxen and with placebo in treating severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
This 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the efficacy and tolerability of valdecoxib 10 mg QD (n = 170) or naproxen 500 mg BID (n = 167) with placebo (n = 171) in treating the signs and symptoms of severe RA. Study patients were aged >or=18 years and were diagnosed as having RA for >or=6 months that was stable due to a treatment regimen. Severe RA was defined as a physician's and patient's global assessment of disease activity of fair, poor, or very poor at baseline; >or=6 tender or painful joints; >or=3 swollen joints; >or=45 minutes of morning stiffness; a visual analog scale pain rating of >or=40 mm; or increases since baseline in these measures. Efficacy outcome measures included the percentage of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology Responder Index 20% (ACR-20) at weeks 1, 6 and 12. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by the investigator as mild, moderate, or severe at weeks 1, 6, and 12.
Of the 508 patients randomized, 340 completed the study. The study groups were comparable for age, ethnic origin, weight, height, and concomitant medications, but the naproxen group had significantly more men (29% [49/167]) than the valdecoxib (18% [31/170]) and placebo (16% [27/171]) groups. The percentage of patients achieving an ACR-20 response was significantly greater in the valdecoxib and naproxen treatment groups (58.8% [100/170] and 60.8% [101/166], respectively) than in the placebo group (39.6% [67/169]) at week 12 (both, P < 0.001). The percentage of patients achieving an ACR-20 response was significantly greater in the naproxen group than in the placebo group at both week 1 (53.6% [89/166] vs 37.9% [64/169]; P = 0.003) and week 6 (64.5% [107/166] vs 46.7% [79/169]; P = 0.001), and in the valdecoxib group compared with placebo at week 1 (52.9% [90/170]; P = 0.008) but not at week 6. Patients in the valdecoxib and naproxen groups had significantly improved efficacy compared with placebo in most of the other secondary assessments of inflammation, pain, and function. The incidence of AEs was similar in all groups (valdecoxib, 54.1% [92/170]; naproxen, 55.4% [92/166]; and placebo, 52.9% [90/170]).
Valdecoxib 10 mg QD administered over 12 weeks was significantly better than placebo and similar to naproxen 500 mg BID in treating the signs and symptoms of severe RA in these patients.
本研究比较了环氧化酶-2选择性抑制剂伐地考昔与非选择性非甾体抗炎药萘普生及安慰剂治疗重度类风湿关节炎(RA)的疗效和耐受性。
这项为期12周的多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,比较了伐地考昔10毫克每日一次(n = 170)或萘普生500毫克每日两次(n = 167)与安慰剂(n = 171)治疗重度RA体征和症状的疗效和耐受性。研究患者年龄≥18岁,诊断为RA≥6个月,且因治疗方案病情稳定。重度RA定义为医生和患者对基线疾病活动的整体评估为一般、差或非常差;≥6个压痛或疼痛关节;≥3个肿胀关节;≥45分钟晨僵;视觉模拟量表疼痛评分≥40毫米;或这些指标自基线以来有所增加。疗效指标包括在第1、6和12周达到美国风湿病学会应答者指数20%(ACR-20)的患者百分比。不良事件(AE)由研究者在第1、6和12周分为轻度、中度或重度。
随机分组的508例患者中,340例完成了研究。研究组在年龄、种族、体重、身高和合并用药方面具有可比性,但萘普生组男性(29% [49/167])显著多于伐地考昔组(18% [31/170])和安慰剂组(16% [27/171])。在第12周时,伐地考昔和萘普生治疗组达到ACR-20应答的患者百分比(分别为58.8% [100/170]和60.8% [101/166])显著高于安慰剂组(39.6% [67/169])(两者P < 0.001)。在第1周(53.6% [89/166]对37.9% [64/169];P = 0.003)和第6周(64.5% [107/166]对46.7% [79/169];P = 0.001)时,萘普生组达到ACR-20应答的患者百分比显著高于安慰剂组,在第1周时伐地考昔组与安慰剂组相比也显著更高(52.9% [90/170];P = 0.008),但在第6周时无显著差异。在炎症、疼痛和功能的大多数其他次要评估中,伐地考昔组和萘普生组患者的疗效与安慰剂相比均有显著改善。所有组的AE发生率相似(伐地考昔组,54.1% [92/170];萘普生组,55.4% [92/166];安慰剂组,52.9% [90/170])。
在这些患者中,给予12周的伐地考昔10毫克每日一次在治疗重度RA的体征和症状方面显著优于安慰剂,且与萘普生500毫克每日两次相似。