Suppr超能文献

在接受主动脉瓣置换术以治疗主动脉瓣狭窄的患者中,正性肌力药物可改善右心功能。

Inotropes improve right heart function in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

作者信息

Maslow Andrew D, Regan Meredith M, Schwartz Carl, Bert Arthur, Singh Arun

机构信息

From the Departments of Anesthesia and Surgery; Rhode Island Hospital, Providence Rhode Island; Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2004 Apr;98(4):891-902. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000107940.23783.33.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The administration of inotropes after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) is controversial. Issues include the risk of left ventricular (LV) systolic outflow obstruction (LVOTO) and the proper treatment of diastolic dysfunction for patients in whom LV systolic function is often preserved and subsequently improved. In this study, we assessed the hemodynamic benefits of inotropes for patients undergoing AVR for AS. Thirty-four patients were prospectively randomized to one of three groups: epinephrine, milrinone, or placebo. Hemodynamic and echocardiographic data were obtained before and immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Data were also obtained before and after increases in ventricular preload to assess the effects of inotropes on diastolic function. The use of inotropes was associated with significantly larger increases in right ventricular (RV) (placebo, 0.5%; epinephrine, +9%; milrinone, +8%; P < 0.01) and LV (placebo, +7%; epinephrine, +18%; milrinone, +20%; P = 0.07) ejection fractions (EF) and cardiac output after CPB. Changes in cardiac output and index were more strongly correlated with changes in RVEF (r = 0.56, P < 0.01; r = 0.47, P < 0.01, respectively) than with LVEF (r = 0.22, r = 0.08). Of all patients receiving epinephrine or milrinone, only one (1 of 22) had a decrease in RVEF, whereas 6 of 12 patients receiving placebo had a reduction in RVEF from pre-CPB to post-CPB. Correspondingly, for LVEF, 1 of 22 patients receiving inotropes had a decrease in LVEF, whereas 3 of 12 placebo patients had a reduction in LVEF from pre-CPB to post-CPB. No patient had evidence of LVOTO. Inotropes improved hemodynamics after AVR for AS. This was attributable more to improved RV function than to changes in LV function. Although there were no changes in diastolic function, it is possible that this study did not allow significant timing to observe benefits of inotropes on diastolic function in this setting.

IMPLICATIONS

Compared with placebo, both epinephrine and milrinone similarly improved biventricular performance after aortic valve replacement, with a greater impact on right ventricular function. Choice of either inotropic drug should be driven by blood pressure and hemodynamic goals in this setting.

摘要

未标注

主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)治疗主动脉狭窄(AS)后使用正性肌力药物存在争议。问题包括左心室(LV)收缩期流出道梗阻(LVOTO)的风险,以及对于LV收缩功能通常得以保留并随后改善的患者,舒张功能障碍的恰当治疗方法。在本研究中,我们评估了正性肌力药物对接受AVR治疗AS患者的血流动力学益处。34例患者被前瞻性随机分为三组之一:肾上腺素组、米力农组或安慰剂组。在体外循环(CPB)前及CPB后即刻获取血流动力学和超声心动图数据。在心室前负荷增加前后也获取数据,以评估正性肌力药物对舒张功能的影响。使用正性肌力药物与CPB后右心室(RV)(安慰剂组,0.5%;肾上腺素组,+9%;米力农组,+8%;P<0.01)和LV(安慰剂组,+7%;肾上腺素组,+18%;米力农组,+20%;P = 0.07)射血分数(EF)及心输出量的显著更大增加相关。心输出量及其指数的变化与RVEF变化的相关性(分别为r = 0.56,P<0.01;r = 0.47,P<0.01)比与LVEF变化的相关性(r = 0.22,r = 0.08)更强。在所有接受肾上腺素或米力农治疗的患者中,只有1例(22例中的1例)RVEF降低,而接受安慰剂治疗的12例患者中有6例从CPB前到CPB后RVEF降低。相应地,对于LVEF,接受正性肌力药物治疗的22例患者中有1例LVEF降低,而12例安慰剂组患者中有3例从CPB前到CPB后LVEF降低。没有患者有LVOTO的证据。正性肌力药物改善了AVR治疗AS后的血流动力学。这更多归因于RV功能的改善而非LV功能的变化。尽管舒张功能没有变化,但在这种情况下本研究可能没有留出足够的时间来观察正性肌力药物对舒张功能的益处。

启示

与安慰剂相比,肾上腺素和米力农在主动脉瓣置换术后同样改善了双心室功能,对右心室功能的影响更大。在这种情况下,应根据血压和血流动力学目标来选择这两种正性肌力药物中的任何一种。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验