Tobias Joseph D
From the Departments of Child Health and Anesthesiology and the Division of Pediatric Critical Care/Pediatric Anesthesiology, The University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Anesth Analg. 2004 Apr;98(4):956-965. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000107938.80562.75.
In view of the overall experience regarding regional anesthetic techniques to control postoperative pain in infants and children, it is feasible that a similar efficacy and safety profile can be obtained when using such techniques after major orthopedic procedures such as anterior or posterior spinal fusion. I reviewed previous reports regarding the use of neuraxial techniques to provide analgesia after spine surgery in the pediatric population. Variations in both the surgical procedure and the analgesic technique may make the comparison among studies somewhat impractical. Variations of the analgesic technique include 1). the dose of the medications used; 2). the route of delivery (intrathecal or epidural); 3). the mode of delivery (single dose, intermittent bolus dosing, and continuous infusion); 4). the number of epidural catheters used (one versus two); 5). the medications infused (opioids, local anesthetics, or both); 6). the opioid used (morphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone); and 7). the analgesic regimen of the control group (intermittent "as needed" morphine or patient-controlled analgesia). Although limited data are available to document the analgesic superiority of these techniques over parenteral opioids, clinical data offer evidence of other benefits, including decreased intraoperative blood loss and quicker return of gastrointestinal function.
鉴于在婴幼儿和儿童中使用区域麻醉技术控制术后疼痛的总体经验,在诸如前路或后路脊柱融合等大型骨科手术后使用此类技术时,获得相似的疗效和安全性是可行的。我回顾了先前关于在儿科人群脊柱手术后使用神经轴技术提供镇痛的报告。手术操作和镇痛技术的差异可能使研究之间的比较有些不切实际。镇痛技术的差异包括:1). 所用药物的剂量;2). 给药途径(鞘内或硬膜外);3). 给药方式(单次剂量、间歇推注给药和持续输注);4). 使用的硬膜外导管数量(一根与两根);5). 输注的药物(阿片类药物、局部麻醉药或两者);6). 使用的阿片类药物(吗啡、芬太尼、氢吗啡酮);以及7). 对照组的镇痛方案(按需间歇使用吗啡或患者自控镇痛)。尽管有限的数据可证明这些技术在镇痛方面优于胃肠外阿片类药物,但临床数据提供了其他益处的证据,包括减少术中失血和更快恢复胃肠功能。