Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
PLoS One. 2021 May 21;16(5):e0251980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251980. eCollection 2021.
Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block has been discussed widely in spine surgery. The aim of our study is to evaluate analgesic efficacy and safety of TLIP block in spine surgery.
We performed a quantitative systematic review. Randomized controlled trials that compared TLIP block to non-block care or wound infiltration for patients undergoing spine surgery and took the pain or morphine consumption as a primary or secondary outcome were included. The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption during 0-24-hour. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain intensity, rescue analgesia requirement, and adverse events.
9 randomized controlled trials with 539 patients were included for analysis. Compared with non-block care, TLIP block was effective to decrease the opioid consumption (WMD -16.00; 95%CI -19.19, -12.81; p<0.001; I2 = 71.6%) for the first 24 hours after the surgery. TLIP block significantly reduced postoperative pain intensity at rest or movement at various time points compared with non-block care, and reduced rescue analgesia requirement ((RR 0.47; 95%CI 0.30, 0.74; p = 0.001; I2 = 0.0%) and postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR 0.58; 95%CI 0.39, 0.86; p = 0.006; I2 = 25.1%). Besides, TLIP block is superior to wound infiltration in terms of opioid consumption (WMD -17.23, 95%CI -21.62, -12.86; p<0.001; I2 = 63.8%), and the postoperative pain intensity at rest was comparable between TLIP block and wound infiltration.
TLIP block improved analgesic efficacy in spine surgery compared with non-block care. Furthermore, current literature supported the TLIP block was superior to wound infiltration in terms of opioid consumption.
胸椎腰椎筋膜平面(TLIP)阻滞在脊柱外科中已被广泛讨论。我们的研究旨在评估 TLIP 阻滞在脊柱手术中的镇痛效果和安全性。
我们进行了一项定量系统评价。纳入了比较 TLIP 阻滞与非阻滞护理或伤口浸润治疗行脊柱手术患者,并将疼痛或吗啡消耗量作为主要或次要结局的随机对照试验。主要结局为 0-24 小时内累积阿片类药物消耗量。次要结局包括术后疼痛强度、解救性镇痛需求和不良事件。
纳入了 9 项随机对照试验,共 539 例患者进行了分析。与非阻滞护理相比,TLIP 阻滞可有效减少术后 24 小时内阿片类药物的消耗(WMD -16.00;95%CI -19.19,-12.81;p<0.001;I2 = 71.6%)。TLIP 阻滞在各个时间点与非阻滞护理相比,显著降低了静息或运动时的术后疼痛强度,并降低了解救性镇痛需求(RR 0.47;95%CI 0.30,0.74;p = 0.001;I2 = 0.0%)和术后恶心呕吐(RR 0.58;95%CI 0.39,0.86;p = 0.006;I2 = 25.1%)。此外,TLIP 阻滞在阿片类药物消耗方面优于伤口浸润(WMD -17.23,95%CI -21.62,-12.86;p<0.001;I2 = 63.8%),而 TLIP 阻滞和伤口浸润在静息时的术后疼痛强度相当。
TLIP 阻滞可改善脊柱手术中的镇痛效果,优于非阻滞护理。此外,目前的文献支持 TLIP 阻滞在阿片类药物消耗方面优于伤口浸润。