• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谐波手术刀与电灼术在肺切除术中的组织学效应:大鼠模型的实验研究

The histological effect of harmonic scalpel and electrocautery in lung resections. An experimental study in a rat model.

作者信息

Cakan A, Cagirici U, Cikirikcioglu M, Posacioglu H, Veral A

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2004 Feb;45(1):63-5.

PMID:15041940
Abstract

AIM

In the last decade, ultrasonically activated scalpels (the Harmonic Scalpel, HS) have been developed and used for both open and endoscopic surgical procedures. The present study compares the deepness of lung tissue damage caused by HS and unipolar electrocautery (EC) in rats.

METHODS

Ten rats were used for the study. Morphological damage on lung parenchyma of the rats was measured with the ocular micrometer in light microscopy.

RESULTS

The mean depth of the tissue damage was 0.23+/-0.08 mm in the HS group, and 0.33+/-0.10 mm in the EC group. The difference was statistically significant between the 2 groups (p=0.028).

CONCLUSION

HS induces significantly less tissue damage than EC in rat lungs.

摘要

目的

在过去十年中,超声手术刀(谐波手术刀,HS)已被开发并用于开放手术和内窥镜手术。本研究比较了HS和单极电灼(EC)在大鼠中造成的肺组织损伤深度。

方法

十只大鼠用于该研究。在光学显微镜下用目镜测微计测量大鼠肺实质的形态学损伤。

结果

HS组组织损伤的平均深度为0.23±0.08mm,EC组为0.33±0.10mm。两组之间的差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.028)。

结论

在大鼠肺中,HS引起的组织损伤明显少于EC。

相似文献

1
The histological effect of harmonic scalpel and electrocautery in lung resections. An experimental study in a rat model.谐波手术刀与电灼术在肺切除术中的组织学效应:大鼠模型的实验研究
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2004 Feb;45(1):63-5.
2
Late onset postoperative pulmonary fistula following a pulmonary segmentectomy using electrocautery or a harmonic scalpel.使用电灼或超声刀进行肺段切除术后迟发性肺瘘。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Aug;16(1):21-5.
3
Monopolar electrocautery versus ultrasonic dissection of the gallbladder from the gallbladder bed in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆囊床处胆囊的单极电烙术与超声解剖术对比
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2013 Jul-Dec;25(3-4):16-8.
4
A parallel group analysis of tonsillectomy using the harmonic scalpel vs electrocautery.使用谐波手术刀与电灼术进行扁桃体切除术的平行组分析。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Jan;131(1):49-51. doi: 10.1001/archotol.131.1.49.
5
Harmonic scalpel versus electrocautery tonsillectomy: a comparative study in adult patients.谐波手术刀与电刀扁桃体切除术:成年患者的比较研究
J Pak Med Assoc. 2011 Mar;61(3):256-9.
6
A comparative study of modified radical mastectomy using harmonic scalpel and electrocautery.使用超声刀和电灼进行改良根治性乳房切除术的对比研究。
Singapore Med J. 2002 May;43(5):226-8.
7
Harmonic technology versus neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser and electrocautery for lung metastasectomy: an experimental study.谐波技术与掺钕钇铝石榴石激光及电灼术用于肺转移瘤切除术的实验研究
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Jul;23(1):47-56. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw067. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
8
Comparison of the harmonic scalpel and the ultrasonic surgical aspirator in subsegmental lung resections: an experimental study.谐波手术刀与超声外科吸引器在亚段肺切除术中的比较:一项实验研究。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Dec;55(8):509-11. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965483.
9
Harmonic scalpel versus electrocautery in breast reduction surgery: a randomized controlled trial.超声刀与高频电刀在乳房缩小术中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Oct;128(4):243e-249e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318221da3e.
10
Ligasure vessel sealing system versus harmonic scalpel for sutureless nonanatomical pulmonary resections in a rabbit model. Which one is safer?在兔模型中,用于无缝合非解剖性肺切除的结扎速血管闭合系统与超声刀对比。哪一种更安全?
Eur Surg Res. 2009;43(1):24-8. doi: 10.1159/000213645. Epub 2009 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Complications after ultrasonic lung parenchyma biopsy: a strong note for caution.
Surg Endosc. 2008 Mar;22(3):679-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9460-0.