Piltz Stefan, Strunk Patrick, Meyer Ludger, Plitz Wolfgang, Lob Guenter
Department of Orthopedic Trauma Surgery, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse15, 81366 Munich, Germany.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004 Sep;12(5):376-83. doi: 10.1007/s00167-003-0463-7. Epub 2004 Mar 24.
This biomechanical study compares the initial fixation strength of a novel bioabsorbable two-shell expansion bolt (EB) with that of a well-established interference-screw technique in bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) reconstruction in a calf model. Thirty tibia plateaus (age 5-6 months) were assigned to three groups: In groups I and II, trapezoidal bone plugs of BPTB grafts were fixed with bioabsorbable poly-L-lactide interference screws (8 x 23 mm) or titanium interference screws (8 x 25 mm) respectively. In group III, semicircular grafts were fixed using bioabsorbable poly-D, L-lactide expansion bolts (5.8/8.7 x 10 x 35 mm). The tensile axis was parallel to the bone tunnel, and the construction was loaded until failure applying a displacement rate of 1 mm per second. In group II the mean ultimate loads to failure (713 N+/-218 N) were found to be significantly higher than those of groups I (487 N+/-205 N) and III (510 N+/-133 N). Measurement of stiffness showed 45 N/mm+/-13.3 in group I, 58 N/mm+/-17.4 in group II and 46 N/mm+/-6.9 in group III, and did not demonstrate significant differences. We found a correlation between insertion torque and wedge insertion force and ultimate loads to failure in all groups (r=0.53 in group I, r =0.54 in group II, and r =0.57 in group III). Cross-section planes of bone tunnel increased by 51%, 30% and 31% respectively, following insertion of screws or expansion of bolts (p<0.05). We conclude that ACL graft fixation by means of the presented expansion bolt demonstrates a fixation strength similar to the established bioabsorbable screw fixation, and is a reasonable alternative fixation method, especially since some of the specific pitfalls of screw fixation can be avoided.
本生物力学研究在小牛模型中,比较了新型生物可吸收双壳膨胀螺栓(EB)与成熟的挤压螺钉技术在骨-髌腱-骨(BPTB)重建中的初始固定强度。将30个胫骨平台(年龄5 - 6个月)分为三组:在第一组和第二组中,BPTB移植物的梯形骨栓分别用生物可吸收聚-L-丙交酯挤压螺钉(8×23 mm)或钛挤压螺钉(8×25 mm)固定。在第三组中,半圆形移植物用生物可吸收聚-D,L-丙交酯膨胀螺栓(5.8/8.7×10×35 mm)固定。拉伸轴与骨隧道平行,以每秒1毫米的位移速率加载结构直至破坏。在第二组中,发现平均破坏极限载荷(713 N±218 N)显著高于第一组(487 N±205 N)和第三组(510 N±133 N)。刚度测量显示,第一组为45 N/mm±13.3,第二组为58 N/mm±17.4,第三组为46 N/mm±6.9,且未显示出显著差异。我们发现所有组的插入扭矩、楔形插入力与破坏极限载荷之间均存在相关性(第一组r = 0.53,第二组r = 0.54,第三组r = 0.57)。插入螺钉或螺栓扩张后,骨隧道的横截面分别增加了51%、30%和31%(p<0.05)。我们得出结论,采用本研究中的膨胀螺栓进行前交叉韧带移植物固定,其固定强度与成熟的生物可吸收螺钉固定相似,是一种合理的替代固定方法,特别是因为可以避免螺钉固定的一些特定缺陷。