3B's Research Group-Biomaterials, Biodegradables and Biomimetics, University of Minho, Headquarters of European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, AvePark, S. Cláudio de Barco, 4806-909, Taipas, Guimarães, Portugal.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Apr;21(4):986-94. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2414-2. Epub 2013 Feb 3.
Although bioabsorbable screws promise to degrade within months up to several years after implantation, often this does not happen. In fact, other problems such as screw breakage, tunnel enlargement, allergic or foreign body reactions, cyst or abscess formation, and delayed migration of "biodegradable" screws have been reported. This study aims to provide relevant basic science knowledge and recent insights concerning "biomaterials" currently used in fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair. A systematic review on the topic of screw "migration" is provided.
A PubMed search combining all the key terms was done looking for complications related to late migration of "bioabsorbable" screws used in ACL reconstruction without inferior time limitation up to January 2012. Only clinical reports were included. Reference lists of reports were checked to detect others not identified by the original search. A pre-publication search was performed to identify the most recent relevant articles.
A total of ten articles referred to migration of "bioabsorbable" interference screws. Most cases reported on poly-L-lactic acid-based screws. Migration was noticed between 3 and 22 months postoperatively. It was noticed both in the tibia and the femur and with the application of several types of graft.
Migration is a possible complication of "bioabsorbable" interference screws. The information related to all clinical implications of the so-called "biodegradable screws" remains scarce and probably suffers from the phenomenon of publication bias. The complexity of possible reactions occurring in the human body is difficult to reproduce under controlled laboratory conditions.
尽管可吸收螺钉承诺在植入后数月至数年降解,但实际上这种情况并不常见。事实上,已经报道了其他问题,如螺钉断裂、隧道扩大、过敏或异物反应、囊肿或脓肿形成以及“可生物降解”螺钉的延迟迁移。本研究旨在提供与目前用于前交叉韧带(ACL)修复固定装置的“生物材料”相关的基础知识和最新见解。提供了关于螺钉“迁移”主题的系统评价。
通过对无时间下限的 PubMed 搜索,结合所有关键词搜索与 ACL 重建中使用的“生物可吸收”螺钉延迟迁移相关的并发症,检索时间截至 2012 年 1 月。仅包括临床报告。检查报告的参考文献以发现原始搜索未识别的其他报告。进行了预发表搜索以确定最近的相关文章。
共有 10 篇文章涉及“生物可吸收”干扰螺钉的迁移。大多数报告涉及聚 L-乳酸基螺钉。术后 3 至 22 个月出现迁移。在胫骨和股骨中均有发现,并且应用了几种类型的移植物。
迁移是“生物可吸收”干扰螺钉的一种可能并发症。与所谓的“可生物降解螺钉”相关的所有临床影响的信息仍然很少,可能受到发表偏倚现象的影响。在受控的实验室条件下,人体中可能发生的复杂反应难以重现。