Martorell Cafranga A, Ayuso Mateos J L
Fundación Carmen Pardo-Valcarce, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de madrid.
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2004 Mar-Apr;32(2):98-106.
In recent years, there has been considerable evidence on the phenomenon of intelligence quotient (IQ) gains over time with a gain rate of approximately three IQ points per decade. This phenomenon has been called the Flynn effect. This review article presents the evidence that supports this effect and discusses its implications for the measurement of intelligence. The above mentioned IQ gains over time obviously present serious methodological and theoretical problems in the use of intelligence tests. We review the methodological consequences which the Flynn effect presents in the reliability of the measurement of IQ as well as the methodological consequences which this effect has for epidemiological studies, especially those which focus on the study of the prevalence of mental retardation. Mention is made of the hypothesis that tries to explain these IQ gains, analyzing those which tend to explain these IQ gains as real gains in intelligence, as well as those that propose that these gains are due to other causes rather to real population IQ gains.
近年来,有大量证据表明智商(IQ)会随时间推移而提高,增长率约为每十年三个智商点。这一现象被称为弗林效应。这篇综述文章展示了支持该效应的证据,并讨论了其对智力测量的影响。上述随时间推移的智商提高显然在智力测试的使用中带来了严重的方法学和理论问题。我们回顾了弗林效应在智商测量可靠性方面呈现的方法学后果,以及该效应在流行病学研究中,尤其是那些专注于智力迟钝患病率研究的方法学后果。文中提到了试图解释这些智商提高的假说,分析了那些倾向于将这些智商提高解释为智力真正提高的假说,以及那些提出这些提高是由其他原因而非实际人群智商提高导致的假说。