Flynn James R
University of Otago, Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Econ Hum Biol. 2009 Mar;7(1):18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2009.01.009. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
The hypothesis that enhanced nutrition is mainly responsible for massive IQ gains over time borrows plausibility from the height gains of the 20th century. However, evidence shows that the two trends are largely independent. A detailed analysis of IQ trends on the Raven's Progressive Matrices tests in Britain dramatizes the poverty of the nutrition hypothesis. A multiple factor hypothesis that operates on three levels is offered as an alternative instrument of causal explanation. The Raven's data show that over the 65 years from circa 1942 to the present, taking ages 5-15 together, British school children have gained 14 IQ points for a rate of 0.216 points per year. However, since 1979, gains have declined with age and between the ages of 12-13 and 14-15, small gains turn into small losses. This is confirmed by Piagetian data and poses the possibility that the cognitive demands of teen-age subculture have been stagnant over perhaps the last 30 years.
随着时间推移,营养改善是智商大幅提高的主要原因,这一假设看似合理,因为20世纪人们身高有所增长。然而,证据表明这两种趋势在很大程度上是相互独立的。对英国瑞文标准推理测验中智商趋势的详细分析凸显了营养假设的缺陷。作为因果解释的另一种手段,我们提出了一个在三个层面起作用的多因素假设。瑞文测验的数据显示,从大约1942年到现在的65年里,将5至15岁的儿童放在一起计算,英国学童的智商提高了14分,即每年提高0.216分。然而,自1979年以来,智商增长随年龄下降,在12 - 13岁至14 - 15岁之间,小幅度增长变成了小幅度下降。这一现象得到了皮亚杰理论数据的证实,这表明在过去30年里,青少年亚文化对认知的要求可能一直停滞不前。