Gill James M, Mainous Arch G, Diamond James J, Lenhard M James
Health Services Research, Christiana Care Health Services, Wilmington, Del 19803, USA.
Ann Fam Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;1(3):162-70. doi: 10.1370/afm.22.
Many patients with diabetes fail to receive recommended monitoring tests. One reason might be inadequate continuity of care. This study examined the association between provider continuity and completion of monitoring tests for patients with diabetes mellitus.
A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on claims data from a private national health plan for 1 year (January 1, 1999, through December 31, 1999). Participants had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and at least 2 outpatient visits during the study year (N = 1,795). The association was measured between continuity of care with an individual provider and completion of 3 diabetes monitoring tests: a glycosylated hemoglobin test, a lipid profile, and an eye examination.
Eighty-one percent of patients had a glycosylated hemoglobin test, 66% had a lipid profile, and 28% had an eye examination during the study year. After controlling for demographics, number of diabetes visits, case mix, and diabetes complications, provider continuity was not significantly associated with the receipt of a glycosylated hemoglobin test (odds ratio [OR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-1.16), a lipid profile (OR = 0.97, 95% CI, 0.57-1.64) or an eye examination (OR = 0.60, 95% CI, 0.30-1.19). When continuity was measured only among primary care providers, there was no significant association for receipt of a glycosylated hemoglobin test (OR = 0.73, 95% CI, 0.41-1.33), a lipid profile (OR = 0.88, 95% CI, 0.53-1.47) or an eye examination (OR = 0.70, 95% CI, 0.35-1.36).
This study found no association between provider continuity and completion of diabetes monitoring tests in a national privately insured population. Whereas continuity might benefit other aspects of health care, it does not appear to benefit improved monitoring for diabetes.
许多糖尿病患者未能接受推荐的监测检查。原因之一可能是医疗护理的连续性不足。本研究调查了医疗服务提供者的连续性与糖尿病患者监测检查完成情况之间的关联。
对一家全国性私人健康保险计划1年(1999年1月1日至1999年12月31日)的理赔数据进行横断面分析。参与者在研究年度内被诊断为糖尿病且至少有2次门诊就诊(N = 1795)。测量了与个体医疗服务提供者的医疗护理连续性与3项糖尿病监测检查完成情况之间的关联:糖化血红蛋白检测、血脂谱检测和眼科检查。
在研究年度内,81%的患者进行了糖化血红蛋白检测,66%的患者进行了血脂谱检测,28%的患者进行了眼科检查。在控制了人口统计学因素、糖尿病就诊次数、病例组合和糖尿病并发症后,医疗服务提供者的连续性与糖化血红蛋白检测的接受情况(优势比[OR]=0.61,95%置信区间[CI],0.32 - 1.16)、血脂谱检测(OR = 0.97,95% CI,0.57 - 1.64)或眼科检查(OR = 0.60,95% CI,0.30 - 1.19)无显著关联。当仅在初级保健提供者中测量连续性时,糖化血红蛋白检测的接受情况(OR = 0.73,95% CI,0.41 - 1.33)、血脂谱检测(OR = 0.88,95% CI,0.53 - 1.47)或眼科检查(OR = 0.70,95% CI,0.35 - 1.36)均无显著关联。
本研究发现,在全国有私人保险的人群中,医疗服务提供者的连续性与糖尿病监测检查的完成情况之间无关联。虽然连续性可能有益于医疗保健的其他方面,但似乎对改善糖尿病监测并无益处。