Bezemer T M, Graça O, Rousseau P, van der Putten W H
Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Centre for Terrestrial Ecology, Heteren, The Netherlands.
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2004 Mar-Apr;6(2):231-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-817846.
The capacity of local communities to control introduced plants is called biotic resistance. Biotic resistance has been almost exclusively tested for plant competition and above ground herbivores and pathogens, while neglecting root herbivores and soil pathogens. Here, we present biotic resistance by above- and below ground herbivores in concert, and relate the abundance of the plant enemies to the species diversity of the local plant communities. The study was carried out in a 7-year-old biodiversity field experiment. We used creeping thistle (Cirsium arvense) as a model, and quantified sap-sucking herbivores: above ground aphids, their antagonists, and root-feeding nematodes. As plant diversity treatments, we used field plots sown with high (15 plant species, HSD) or low (4 plant species, LSD) diverse seed mixtures in 1996 and that were not weeded. Creeping thistle became established spontaneously at the start of the experiment. In 2002, in HSD plots, 90 % of the plant community was made up by 11 species, compared to seven species in LSD plots. No differences were found for C. arvense abundance or biomass. Above ground, three aphid species were found on C. arvense-Uroleucon cirsii, Aphis fabae, and Macrosiphum euphorbiae, but the latter was found only in low densities. Significantly more aphid species were found on individual plants in HSD plots. Moreover, in HSD plots, on average 10 % of aphids were parasitized, while no parasitism was observed in LSD plots. In the root zone of C. arvense, significantly more nematodes were found in HSD than in LSD plots, and a significantly higher proportion of those nematodes were plant parasites. The dominant plant parasitic nematode in both treatments was Paratylenchus. We conclude that biotic resistance by natural enemies may be enhanced by plant species diversity, but that above- and below ground sap-sucking herbivores do not necessarily have to respond similarly to the diversity of the surrounding plant community.
当地社区控制外来植物的能力被称为生物抗性。生物抗性几乎仅针对植物竞争以及地上食草动物和病原体进行了测试,而忽略了地下食草动物和土壤病原体。在此,我们展示了地上和地下食草动物协同作用下的生物抗性,并将植物天敌的丰度与当地植物群落的物种多样性联系起来。该研究在一个开展了7年的生物多样性田间试验中进行。我们以田蓟(Cirsium arvense)为模型,对吸食汁液的食草动物进行了量化:地上蚜虫、它们的天敌以及以根为食的线虫。作为植物多样性处理,我们使用了1996年播种了高多样性(15种植物,HSD)或低多样性(4种植物,LSD)种子混合物且未除草的田间地块。田蓟在实验开始时自然生长。2002年,在HSD地块中,90%的植物群落由11个物种组成,而LSD地块中有7个物种。田蓟的丰度或生物量未发现差异。在地上,在田蓟上发现了三种蚜虫——蓟长管蚜(Uroleucon cirsii)、豆蚜(Aphis fabae)和大戟长管蚜(Macrosiphum euphorbiae),但后者仅在低密度下被发现。在HSD地块的单株植物上发现的蚜虫物种显著更多。此外,在HSD地块中,平均10%的蚜虫被寄生,而在LSD地块中未观察到寄生现象。在田蓟的根区,HSD地块中发现的线虫明显多于LSD地块,且这些线虫中植物寄生线虫的比例显著更高。两种处理中占主导地位的植物寄生线虫是小环线虫(Paratylenchus)。我们得出结论,植物物种多样性可能会增强天敌的生物抗性,但地上和地下吸食汁液的食草动物对周围植物群落多样性的反应不一定相似。