Bilsky Mark H, Yamada Yoshiya, Yenice Kamil M, Lovelock Michael, Hunt Margie, Gutin Philip H, Leibel Steven A
Neurosurgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Neurosurgery. 2004 Apr;54(4):823-30; discussion 830-1. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000114263.01917.1e.
Radioresistant paraspinal tumors may benefit from conformal treatment techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Local tumor control and long-term palliation for both primary and metastatic tumors may be achieved with IMRT while reducing the risk of spinal cord toxicity associated with conventional radiotherapy techniques. In this article, we report our initial clinical experience in treating 16 paraspinal tumors with IMRT in which the planning target volume was 2 mm or greater from the spinal cord.
IMRT was administered by using a linear accelerator mounted with a multileaf collimator. Two immobilization body frames developed at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center were used for patients with and without spinal implants. During a 30-month period, 16 patients underwent IMRT for metastatic and primary tumors. Eleven patients were treated for symptomatic recurrences after undergoing surgery and prior external beam radiotherapy, and one patient was treated after undergoing radiotherapy for a metastatic pancreatic gastrinoma with overlapping ports to the spine. Four patients with primary tumors were treated after primary resection that resulted in positive histological margins. Twelve patients were symptomatic with pain, functional radiculopathy, or both. Tumoral doses were determined on the basis of the relative radiosensitivity of tumors. Patients with metastatic tumors were administered a median tumoral dose of 20 Gy in four to five fractions and a spinal cord maximum dose of 6.0 Gy in addition to the full tolerance dose administered in previous radiation treatments. The primary tumors were delivered a median dose of 70 Gy in 33 to 37 fractions and a spinal cord maximum dose of 16 Gy. The median tumoral volume was 7.8 cm(3).
Of the 15 patients who underwent radiographic follow-up, 13 demonstrated either no interval growth or a reduction in tumor size in a median follow-up period of 12 months (range, 2-23 mo). Two patients, one with a thoracic chondrosarcoma and one with a chordoma, showed tumor progression 1 year after undergoing IMRT. Pain symptoms improved in 11 of 11 patients, and 4 of 4 patients had significant improvement in their functionally significant radiculopathy and/or plexopathy. Pain relief was durable in all patients except the two with tumor progression. No patient showed signs or symptoms of radiation-induced myelopathy, radiculopathy, or plexopathy, including 12 patients with a median follow-up of 18 months.
IMRT was effective for treating pain and improving functional radiculopathy in patients with metastatic and primary tumors. Although long-term tumor control is not established in this study, high-dose tumoral irradiation can be performed without causing radiation myelopathy in more than 1 year of follow-up.
对射线抵抗的脊柱旁肿瘤可能从适形治疗技术如调强放射治疗(IMRT)中获益。IMRT可实现对原发性和转移性肿瘤的局部肿瘤控制及长期姑息治疗,同时降低与传统放射治疗技术相关的脊髓毒性风险。在本文中,我们报告了我们用IMRT治疗16例脊柱旁肿瘤的初步临床经验,这些肿瘤的计划靶体积距离脊髓2毫米或更远。
使用安装有多叶准直器的直线加速器进行IMRT。纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心研发的两种固定身体框架分别用于有和没有脊柱植入物的患者。在30个月期间,16例患者接受了针对转移性和原发性肿瘤的IMRT。11例患者在接受手术和先前的外照射放疗后因症状复发接受治疗,1例患者在接受针对转移性胰腺胃泌素瘤的放疗且射野与脊柱重叠后接受治疗。4例原发性肿瘤患者在原发性切除后组织学切缘阳性接受治疗。12例患者有疼痛、功能性神经根病或两者皆有的症状。肿瘤剂量根据肿瘤的相对放射敏感性确定。转移性肿瘤患者接受的中位肿瘤剂量为20 Gy,分4至5次给予,脊髓最大剂量为6.0 Gy,此外还包括先前放疗中给予的全耐受剂量。原发性肿瘤给予的中位剂量为70 Gy,分33至37次给予,脊髓最大剂量为16 Gy。中位肿瘤体积为7.8 cm³。
在15例接受影像学随访的患者中,13例在中位随访期12个月(范围2 - 23个月)内显示无间隔期生长或肿瘤大小缩小。2例患者,1例为胸段软骨肉瘤,1例为脊索瘤,在接受IMRT 1年后显示肿瘤进展。11例患者中的11例疼痛症状改善,4例患者中的4例功能性显著的神经根病和/或神经丛病有显著改善。除2例肿瘤进展患者外,所有患者的疼痛缓解均持久。没有患者出现放射性脊髓病、神经根病或神经丛病的体征或症状,包括12例中位随访18个月的患者。
IMRT对治疗转移性和原发性肿瘤患者的疼痛及改善功能性神经根病有效。尽管本研究未确立长期肿瘤控制,但在超过1年的随访中,高剂量肿瘤照射可在不引起放射性脊髓病的情况下进行。