Clusmann Hans, Kral Thomas, Gleissner Ulrike, Sassen Robert, Urbach Horst, Blümcke Ingmar, Bogucki Jacek, Schramm Johannes
Department of Neurosurgery, Bonn Medical Center, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany.
Neurosurgery. 2004 Apr;54(4):847-59; discussion 859-60. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000114141.37640.37.
Resection strategies for the treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) are a matter of discussion. Few data on the significance of resection type are available for pediatric patients with TLE.
Data for a series of 89 children who were surgically treated for TLE were analyzed. A first cohort of patients were mainly surgically treated with anterior temporal lobectomies. For a second cohort, resections were preoperatively "tailored" to the lesion and presumed epileptogenic area.
The follow-up period was 46 months (range, 14-118 mo). Seventy-seven patients (87%) attained satisfactory seizure control (82% Engel Class I and 5% Class II). For 12 patients (13%), seizure control was unsatisfactory (8% Class III and 5% Class IV). Anterior temporal lobectomies resulted in 94% satisfactory seizure control (33 patients), whereas the success rates were only 74% (20 patients) for amygdalohippocampectomy (AH) (P = 0.023) and 77% (13 patients) for lesionectomy plus hippocampectomy (not significant). All patients who underwent purely lateral temporal lesionectomies became seizure-free (14 patients). Logistic regression revealed the factors of AH (P = 0.021) and left-side surgery (P = 0.017) as significant predictors of unsatisfactory seizure control. Satisfactory seizure control was not dependent on the histopathological diagnoses. There was a low rate of verbal memory deterioration after left-side operations. Neuropsychological deterioration was rare after right temporal resections. Attentional and contralateral functions improved after surgery.
Surgery for the treatment of juvenile TLE is successful and safe, but the resection type may influence outcomes. Results after AHs were disappointing, probably because of difficulties in precise localization of the epileptogenic focus among children. Neuropsychological results demonstrated minimal rates of deterioration and significant improvements in contralateral functions. Surgical treatment of juvenile TLE should be encouraged, but the use of especially left AH should possibly be restricted.
颞叶癫痫(TLE)的手术治疗策略仍存在争议。关于手术切除类型对小儿TLE患者的意义,目前可用数据较少。
分析了89例接受TLE手术治疗儿童的数据。第一组患者主要接受前颞叶切除术。第二组患者的切除术则在术前根据病变和推测的致痫区进行“定制”。
随访期为46个月(范围14 - 118个月)。77例患者(87%)获得了满意的癫痫控制(82%为Engel I级,5%为II级)。12例患者(13%)癫痫控制不满意(8%为III级,5%为IV级)。前颞叶切除术的癫痫控制满意率为94%(33例患者),而杏仁核海马切除术(AH)的成功率仅为74%(20例患者)(P = 0.023),病灶切除术加海马切除术为77%(13例患者)(无显著差异)。所有接受单纯颞叶外侧病灶切除术的患者均无癫痫发作(14例患者)。逻辑回归显示,AH(P = 0.021)和左侧手术(P = 0.017)是癫痫控制不满意的显著预测因素。满意的癫痫控制不依赖于组织病理学诊断。左侧手术后言语记忆减退发生率较低。右侧颞叶切除术后神经心理功能恶化罕见。术后注意力和对侧功能有所改善。
青少年TLE手术治疗成功且安全,但切除类型可能影响预后。AH术后结果令人失望,可能是因为儿童致痫灶精确定位困难。神经心理学结果显示功能恶化率极低,对侧功能有显著改善。应鼓励对青少年TLE进行手术治疗,但尤其应限制左侧AH的使用。