Quiñones-Hinojosa Alfredo, Alam Mirza, Lyon Russ, Yingling Charles D, Lawton Michael T
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143-0112, USA.
Neurosurgery. 2004 Apr;54(4):916-24; discussion 924. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000114511.33035.af.
Microsurgical clipping of basilar artery aneurysms carries a risk of neurological compromise resulting from midbrain or thalamic ischemia. Somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring and electroencephalography are the standard techniques for assessing the level of cerebroprotective anesthesia and monitoring ischemia during temporary occlusion or after permanent clipping. Transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring was added to determine whether this modality improved intraoperative monitoring.
Combined SSEP/electroencephalographic/TcMEP monitoring was used for 30 consecutive patients with basilar artery apex aneurysms in the past 1.5 years. Voltage thresholds were recorded before, during, and after aneurysm treatment for the last 10 patients.
All 30 patients underwent an orbitozygomatic craniotomy for clipping (28 patients), wrapping (1 patient), or superficial temporal artery-superior cerebellar artery bypass (1 patient). Electrophysiological changes occurred for 10 patients (33%), elicited by temporary clipping (6 patients), permanent clipping (3 patients), or retraction (1 patient). Isolated SSEP changes were observed for one patient, isolated TcMEP changes for five patients, and changes in both TcMEPs and SSEPs for four patients. Among patients with simultaneous changes, TcMEP abnormalities were more robust and occurred earlier than SSEP abnormalities. Impaired motor conduction was detected first with an increase in the voltage threshold (from 206 +/- 22 to 410 +/- 49 V, P < 0.05, n = 3) and then with loss of TcMEP responses. SSEP and TcMEP signals returned to baseline values for all patients after corrective measures were taken.
TcMEP monitoring can be safely and easily added to traditional neurophysiological monitoring during basilar artery aneurysm surgery. These results suggest that TcMEPs may be more sensitive than SSEPs to basilar artery and perforating artery ischemia. This additional intraoperative information might minimize the incidence of ischemic complications attributable to prolonged temporary occlusion or inadvertent perforator occlusion.
基底动脉动脉瘤的显微手术夹闭存在因中脑或丘脑缺血导致神经功能受损的风险。体感诱发电位(SSEP)监测和脑电图是评估脑保护麻醉水平以及在临时夹闭或永久夹闭后监测缺血情况的标准技术。增加经颅运动诱发电位(TcMEP)监测以确定这种方式是否能改善术中监测。
在过去1.5年中,对30例连续的基底动脉尖部动脉瘤患者采用联合SSEP/脑电图/TcMEP监测。记录了最后10例患者在动脉瘤治疗前、治疗期间和治疗后的电压阈值。
所有30例患者均接受眶颧开颅术进行夹闭(28例)、包裹(1例)或颞浅动脉-小脑上动脉搭桥术(1例)。10例患者(33%)出现电生理变化,原因包括临时夹闭(6例)、永久夹闭(3例)或牵拉(1例)。1例患者观察到孤立的SSEP变化,5例患者出现孤立的TcMEP变化,4例患者的TcMEP和SSEP均有变化。在同时出现变化的患者中,TcMEP异常比SSEP异常更明显且出现更早。首先检测到运动传导受损,表现为电压阈值升高(从206±22V升高至410±49V,P<0.05,n = 3),随后TcMEP反应消失。采取纠正措施后,所有患者的SSEP和TcMEP信号均恢复至基线值。
在基底动脉动脉瘤手术中,可安全、简便地将TcMEP监测添加到传统神经生理监测中。这些结果表明,TcMEP对基底动脉和穿支动脉缺血可能比SSEP更敏感。这种额外的术中信息可能会降低因长时间临时夹闭或意外穿支动脉夹闭导致的缺血并发症发生率。