• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用SCL - 8量表在综合医院中检测精神障碍。

Detecting mental disorders in general hospitals by the SCL-8 scale.

作者信息

Fink Per, Ørbøl Eva, Hansen Morten Steen, Søndergaard Lene, De Jonge Peter

机构信息

Research Unit for Functional Disorders, Psychosomatics and CL Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital, Noerrebrogade 44, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2004 Mar;56(3):371-5. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00071-0.

DOI:10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00071-0
PMID:15046976
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to validate the eight-item dichotomised version of the Symptoms Check List (SCL-8d) as a screening tool for psychiatric disorders.

METHODS

The study population included 198 consecutive new neurological inpatients and outpatients and 294 consecutive internal medical inpatients, aged 18 or older. All patients received the SCL-8d questionnaire, and a stratified subsample was interviewed using the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) interview. We tested the external SCL-8d validity using the SCAN interview as gold standard. The test was performed based on weighted data to correct for the skewness introduced by stratification.

RESULTS

The diagnostic performance of the SCL-8d was excellent in the internal medical setting but not quite as good in the neurological sample. It performed better among the older compared with the younger patients, whereas the scale was not affected by gender. In the combined sample at the cut point 0/1, the sensitivity (SE) of the SCL-8d was 0.73 (confidence interval CI: 0.60-0.82), the specificity (SP) 0.61 (CI(95%): 0.53-0.68) and the positive predictive value (PPV) 0.42 (CI(95%): 0.34-0.50), using any International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) psychiatric disorder, excluding somatoform and substance abuse disorders, as gold standard. The risk of a patient having a mental disorder (except phobia, substance abuse or somatoform disorder) was less than 6% in case of a negative screening test. In patients with a current depressive disorder, 87.1% (27/31) were screening positive, and all except 1 (93.0%) of the 14 patients with a modest to severe depression scored 1 or higher on the SCL-8d. All 17 patients with an anxiety disorder, excluding phobias, were screening positive.

CONCLUSION

The study suggests that the SCL-8d is a valid, brief screening tool for use in nonpsychiatric medical settings, especially to detect emotional psychiatric disorders (EPDs).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证症状清单(SCL - 8d)的八项二分法版本作为精神疾病筛查工具的有效性。

方法

研究人群包括198名连续的新神经科住院患者和门诊患者以及294名连续的内科住院患者,年龄均在18岁及以上。所有患者均接受SCL - 8d问卷,并且使用神经精神病学临床评估量表(SCAN)访谈对一个分层子样本进行了访谈。我们以SCAN访谈作为金标准来测试SCL - 8d的外部效度。该测试基于加权数据进行,以校正分层引入的偏态。

结果

SCL - 8d在内科环境中的诊断性能极佳,但在神经科样本中表现稍逊。与年轻患者相比,其在老年患者中表现更好,而该量表不受性别的影响。在联合样本中,切点为0/1时,以任何国际疾病及相关健康问题统计分类第十版(ICD - 10)精神疾病(不包括躯体形式障碍和物质滥用障碍)作为金标准,SCL - 8d的敏感性(SE)为0.73(95%置信区间[CI]:0.60 - 0.82),特异性(SP)为0.61(CI(95%):0.53 - 0.68),阳性预测值(PPV)为0.42(CI(95%):0.34 - 0.50)。筛查试验结果为阴性时,患者患有精神障碍(恐惧症、物质滥用或躯体形式障碍除外)的风险低于6%。在当前患有抑郁症的患者中,87.1%(27/31)筛查呈阳性,在14例中度至重度抑郁症患者中,除1例(93.0%)外,所有患者在SCL - 8d上的得分均为1分或更高。所有17例焦虑症患者(不包括恐惧症)筛查均呈阳性。

结论

该研究表明,SCL - 8d是一种有效的简短筛查工具,可用于非精神科医疗环境,尤其是用于检测情感性精神障碍(EPDs)。

相似文献

1
Detecting mental disorders in general hospitals by the SCL-8 scale.运用SCL - 8量表在综合医院中检测精神障碍。
J Psychosom Res. 2004 Mar;56(3):371-5. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00071-0.
2
A brief diagnostic screening instrument for mental disturbances in general medical wards.一种用于综合内科病房精神障碍的简短诊断筛查工具。
J Psychosom Res. 2004 Jul;57(1):17-24. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00374-X.
3
A brief case-finding questionnaire for common mental disorders: the CMDQ.一份针对常见精神障碍的简短病例筛查问卷:CMDQ问卷
Fam Pract. 2005 Aug;22(4):448-57. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmi025. Epub 2005 Apr 6.
4
Screening for bipolar disorder in a Spanish sample of outpatients with current major depressive episode.在西班牙当前患有重度抑郁发作的门诊患者样本中筛查双相情感障碍。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):299-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.025. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
5
Validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to assess depression and anxiety following traumatic brain injury as compared with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV.与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版结构化临床访谈相比,医院焦虑抑郁量表用于评估创伤性脑损伤后抑郁和焦虑的效度。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.007. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
6
Depressive, anxiety, and somatoform disorders in primary care: prevalence and recognition.基层医疗中的抑郁、焦虑和躯体形式障碍:患病率与识别情况
Depress Anxiety. 2007;24(3):185-95. doi: 10.1002/da.20192.
7
Validity of the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) as a screening tool for depression amongst Nigerian university students.患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)作为尼日利亚大学生抑郁症筛查工具的有效性。
J Affect Disord. 2006 Nov;96(1-2):89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.05.021. Epub 2006 Jul 20.
8
Screening for depression in older medical inpatients.老年内科住院患者的抑郁症筛查
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 May;21(5):469-76. doi: 10.1002/gps.1497.
9
Cross validation with the mood disorder questionnaire (MDQ) of an instrument for the detection of hypomania in Spanish: the 32 item hypomania symptom check list (HCL-32).使用用于检测西班牙语躁狂发作的工具——32项轻躁狂症状检查表(HCL-32),与心境障碍问卷(MDQ)进行交叉验证。
J Affect Disord. 2007 Aug;101(1-3):43-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.09.040. Epub 2006 Dec 26.
10
Screening for mental disorders in cardiology outpatients.心血管门诊患者精神障碍的筛查
Nord J Psychiatry. 2008;62(2):147-50. doi: 10.1080/08039480801983562.

引用本文的文献

1
Trajectories of Change, Illness Understanding, and Parental Worries in Children and Adolescents Undergoing Internet-Delivered Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders: Protocol for a Single-Case Design and Explorative Pilot Study.接受互联网认知行为疗法治疗功能性腹痛障碍的儿童和青少年的变化轨迹、疾病认知及父母担忧:单病例设计与探索性试点研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 7;14:e58563. doi: 10.2196/58563.
2
The Association of Antidepressants in Late Pregnancy with Postpartum Hemorrhage: Systematic Review of Controlled Observational Studies.妊娠晚期使用抗抑郁药与产后出血的关联:对照观察性研究的系统评价
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2024 Dec;34(10):428-446. doi: 10.1089/cap.2024.0085. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
3
Screening tools assessing mental illness in primary care: A systematic review.初诊中的精神疾病筛查工具:系统评价。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2418299. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2418299. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
4
Can internal medicine specialists diagnose functional somatic disorders (FSDs)? Training and comparison with FSD specialists.内科医生能否诊断功能性躯体障碍(FSD)?培训及与 FSD 专家的比较。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 12;19(7):e0307057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307057. eCollection 2024.
5
'My child could have died': counterfactual thoughts and psychological distress in parents of trauma survivors.“我的孩子本可能会死”:创伤幸存者父母的反事实思维和心理困扰。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2326736. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2326736. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
6
Internet-Delivered Therapy for Parents With Health Anxiety by Proxy: Protocol for a Single-Case Experimental Design Study.通过代理对患有健康焦虑症的父母进行互联网治疗:单病例实验设计研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 24;12:e46927. doi: 10.2196/46927.
7
Are Sexual Assaults Related to Functional Somatic Disorders? A Cross-Sectional Study.性侵犯是否与功能性躯体障碍有关?一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Oct 20;20(20):6947. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20206947.
8
Conditioned pain modulation and pain sensitivity in functional somatic disorders: The DanFunD study.功能性躯体障碍的条件性疼痛调制和疼痛敏感性:DanFunD 研究。
Eur J Pain. 2022 Jan;26(1):154-166. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1847. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
9
The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on mental and physical health in Denmark - a longitudinal population-based study before and during the first wave.丹麦新冠大流行对精神和身体健康的影响 - 第一波疫情前和期间的一项基于人群的纵向研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 18;21(1):1418. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11472-7.
10
Adverse life events in the general population - a validation of the cumulative lifetime adversity measure.普通人群中的不良生活事件——累积终生逆境测量法的验证
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Feb 10;11(1):1717824. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1717824. eCollection 2020.