Boccaccini Marcus T, Boothby Jennifer L, Brodsky Stanley L
Psychology and Philosophy Department, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX 77341, USA.
Behav Sci Law. 2004;22(2):197-214. doi: 10.1002/bsl.584.
The present study examines the relation between client participation in attorney-client relationships, the development of client trust in criminal defense attorneys, and client satisfaction with attorneys and case outcomes. The congruence model of trust development (CMTD) is proposed to explain the relation between desired participation by clients, allowed participation by attorneys, and the development of client trust in attorneys. The CMTD predicts that clients who trust their attorneys will subsequently be satisfied with their attorneys and case outcomes. A sample of 96 experienced criminal defendants currently in prison completed the Attorney-Client Trust Scale (ACTS: Boccaccini and Brodsky, 2002) and provided information about their experiences with their most recent criminal defense attorneys. Findings were generally consistent with the CMTD in suggesting that (i) allowed participation is associated with trust in attorneys, and (ii) trust is associated with satisfaction with attorneys and case outcomes.
本研究考察了客户在律师-客户关系中的参与度、客户对刑事辩护律师信任的发展以及客户对律师和案件结果的满意度之间的关系。提出了信任发展的一致性模型(CMTD)来解释客户期望的参与度、律师允许的参与度与客户对律师信任的发展之间的关系。CMTD预测,信任其律师的客户随后会对其律师和案件结果感到满意。96名目前在监狱中的有经验的刑事被告样本完成了律师-客户信任量表(ACTS:博卡奇尼和布罗德斯基,2002年),并提供了他们与最近的刑事辩护律师的经历信息。研究结果总体上与CMTD一致,表明:(i)允许的参与度与对律师的信任相关,以及(ii)信任与对律师和案件结果的满意度相关。