Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Program in Applied and Computational Mathematics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Am J Addict. 2018 Dec;27(8):639-645. doi: 10.1111/ajad.12825.
While a large percentage of criminal offenders suffer from substance use disorders (SUDs), virtually nothing is known about the attitudes criminal defense attorneys possess toward their clients who are facing substance-related charges. This is a serious concern, as the burden of steering individuals with SUDs into treatment often falls to criminal defense attorneys. The goal of this study was to examine the attitudes of criminal defense attorneys toward individuals who have been accused of drug crimes.
A questionnaire was sent to criminal defense attorneys (N = 1,933) from all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. It was comprised of (i) demographic information and (ii) a version of the 11-item Medical Condition Regard Scale (MCRS).
Criminal defense attorneys held generally positive attitudes toward clients with substance-related charges, but there was a significant divergence in attitudes between private and public attorneys, with the latter showing both greater familiarity with and better attitudes toward this same group of clients. These differences were impactful: worse attitudes toward clients strongly correlated with greater predictions that the clients would reoffend.
Given the magnitude of the incarcerated population with SUDs and the centrality of defense attorneys in the treatment process, especially its initiation, the divergence in attitudes between private and public criminal defense attorneys is concerning. There is a clear need for increased collaboration between physicians and attorneys, with an aim of increasing the number of individuals with SUDs receiving proper treatment (Am J Addict 2018;XX:1-7).
虽然很大比例的犯罪者患有物质使用障碍(SUD),但实际上对于刑事辩护律师对面临与物质相关指控的客户的态度知之甚少。这是一个严重的问题,因为引导 SUD 患者接受治疗的责任通常落在刑事辩护律师身上。本研究的目的是检查刑事辩护律师对被控毒品犯罪的个人的态度。
从美国 50 个州和哥伦比亚特区向刑事辩护律师(N=1933)发送了一份问卷。问卷包括(i)人口统计学信息和(ii)11 项医疗状况关注量表(MCRS)的版本。
刑事辩护律师对有物质相关指控的客户持有普遍积极的态度,但私人和公共律师之间的态度存在显著差异,后者对同一组客户表现出更大的熟悉度和更好的态度。这些差异具有影响力:对客户的态度越差,强烈预测客户再次犯罪的可能性就越大。
鉴于患有 SUD 的被监禁人口的数量以及辩护律师在治疗过程中的核心地位,尤其是在治疗的启动方面,私人和公共刑事辩护律师之间的态度差异令人担忧。医生和律师之间需要增加合作,目的是增加接受适当治疗的 SUD 患者数量(Am J Addict 2018;XX:1-7)。