• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Past, present, and future standards for management of dyslipidemia.

作者信息

LaRosa John C, Gotto Antonio M

机构信息

State University of New York Health Science Center, Brooklyn, New York 11203, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2004 Mar 22;116 Suppl 6A:3S-8S. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.02.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.02.005
PMID:15050186
Abstract

Evolution of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) guidelines for lipid lowering reflects a movement toward global risk assessment, including improved identification of risk in individuals without established coronary heart disease (CHD), and toward more aggressive lipid-lowering targets to reduce CHD risk. The current guidelines, for example, identify a segment of the population without established CHD as being at high risk on the basis of criteria that indicate CHD risk equivalency, recommend a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) plasma level <100 mg/dL as optimal in all individuals, and establish the metabolic syndrome as a secondary target for therapeutic intervention. Many questions remain for future guidelines to address: To what extent should plasma levels of LDL-C be lowered by therapy to afford optimal risk reduction? Can risk assessment be improved, e.g., by using novel risk measures (such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) to indicate patients at higher risk who may benefit from more aggressive interventions? Should the metabolic syndrome be considered a high-risk state warranting aggressive intervention irrespective of risk categorization using current scoring methods? Guidelines for lipid management represent a synthesis of constantly emerging and evolving data: ongoing efforts to improve understanding of the relation between dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease, to increase knowledge of and ability to measure other CHD risk factors, and to improve therapeutic practices and options will be reflected in future guidelines.

摘要

相似文献

1
Past, present, and future standards for management of dyslipidemia.
Am J Med. 2004 Mar 22;116 Suppl 6A:3S-8S. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.02.005.
2
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and cardiovascular disease prevention: the search for superior treatment.降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇与预防心血管疾病:探寻更优治疗方法。
Am J Med. 2004 Mar 22;116 Suppl 6A:17S-25S. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.02.007.
3
Model-based simulation to explore the cost-effectiveness of following practice guidelines for triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol control among patients with diabetes mellitus and mixed dyslipidemia.基于模型的模拟,以探讨遵循糖尿病和混合性血脂异常患者甘油三酯和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇控制实践指南的成本效益。
Clin Ther. 2009 Apr;31(4):862-79. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.04.015.
4
Raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with reduction of cardiovascular risk: the role of nicotinic acid--a position paper developed by the European Consensus Panel on HDL-C.通过升高高密度脂蛋白胆固醇降低心血管风险:烟酸的作用——欧洲高密度脂蛋白胆固醇共识小组制定的立场文件
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Aug;20(8):1253-68. doi: 10.1185/030079904125004402.
5
New therapeutic options in the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III.美国国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗组第三次报告中的新治疗选择。
Am J Manag Care. 2002 Sep;8(12 Suppl):S301-7.
6
Adult Treatment Panel III: do we really need another set of cholesterol guidelines?
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2002 May;102(5 Suppl 1):S6-11.
7
Implications of cardiac risk and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol distributions in the United States for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia: data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999 to 2002.美国心脏风险和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇分布对血脂异常诊断和治疗的影响:来自1999年至2002年国家健康和营养检查调查的数据
Circulation. 2007 Mar 20;115(11):1363-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.645473. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
8
Effectiveness of the addition of ezetimibe to ongoing statin therapy in modifying lipid profiles and attaining low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals in older and elderly patients: subanalyses of data from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.在老年患者中,依折麦布联合他汀类药物持续治疗对改善血脂谱及实现低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标的有效性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验数据的亚组分析
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2005 Dec;3(4):218-28.
9
Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines.近期临床试验对美国国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗专家组第三次指南的影响。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004 Aug;24(8):e149-61. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000133317.49796.0E.
10
Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines.近期临床试验对美国国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗专家组第三次指南的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Aug 4;44(3):720-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.001.

引用本文的文献

1
A Latin American perspective on the new ACC/AHA clinical guidelines for managing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.拉丁美洲对美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会管理动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病新临床指南的看法。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2014 Apr;16(4):400. doi: 10.1007/s11883-014-0400-x.
2
Effects of dietary flavonoids intake in saudi patients with coronary heart disease.膳食类黄酮摄入量对沙特冠心病患者的影响。
J Family Community Med. 2007 Sep;14(3):119-26.
3
Natural products: a safest approach for obesity.天然产物:肥胖症的最安全方法。
Chin J Integr Med. 2012 Jun;18(6):473-80. doi: 10.1007/s11655-012-1120-0. Epub 2012 Jul 22.
4
LDL Particle Size and Reactive Oxygen Metabolites in Dyslipidemic Patients.血脂异常患者的低密度脂蛋白颗粒大小与活性氧代谢产物
Int J Prev Med. 2012 Mar;3(3):160-6.
5
Heritabilities, apolipoprotein E, and effects of inbreeding on plasma lipids in a genetically isolated population: the Erasmus Rucphen Family Study.遗传力、载脂蛋白E以及近亲繁殖对一个基因隔离人群血浆脂质的影响:伊拉斯姆斯鲁芬家族研究
Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22(2):99-105. doi: 10.1007/s10654-006-9103-0. Epub 2007 Feb 21.
6
Low-density lipoprotein reduction: is the risk worth the benefit?低密度脂蛋白降低:风险是否值得获益?
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2006 Jan;8(1):19-25. doi: 10.1007/s11883-006-0060-6.