Massimino Maura, Gandola Lorenza, Giangaspero Felice, Sandri Alessandro, Valagussa Pinuccia, Perilongo Giorgio, Garrè Maria Luisa, Ricardi Umberto, Forni Marco, Genitori Lorenzo, Scarzello Giovanni, Spreafico Filippo, Barra Salvina, Mascarin Maurizio, Pollo Bianca, Gardiman Martina, Cama Armando, Navarria Pierina, Brisigotti Maurizio, Collini Paola, Balter Rita, Fidani Paola, Stefanelli Maurizio, Burnelli Roberta, Potepan Paolo, Podda Marta, Sotti Guido, Madon Enrico
Department of Pediatric Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Apr 1;58(5):1336-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.08.030.
A postsurgical "stage-based" protocol for ependymoma was designed.
Children were given: (1) focal hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) if with no evidence of disease (NED), or (2) 4 courses with VEC followed by HFRT for residual disease (ED). HFRT dose was 70.4 Gy (1.1 Gy/fraction b.i.d.); VEC consisted of VCR 1.5 mg/m2 1/w, VP16 100 mg/m2/day x 3, CTX 3 g/m2 d 1. When feasible, second-look surgery was recommended.
Sixty-three consecutive children were enrolled: 46 NED, 17 ED; the tumor was infratentorial in 47 and supratentorial in 16, with spinal metastasis in 1. Of NED patients, 35 of 46 have been treated with HFRT; 8 received conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, and 3 received no treatment. Of the 17 ED patients, 9 received VEC + HFRT; violations due to postsurgical morbidity were as follows: HFRT only (2), conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (3) + VEC (2), and no therapy (1). Objective responses to VEC were seen in 54%; objective responses to RT were seen in 75%. Overall survival and progression-free survival at 5 years for all 63 children were 75% and 56%, respectively; for the NED subgroup, 82% and 65%; and for the ED subgroup, 61% and 35%, respectively. All histologies were centrally reviewed. At multivariate analysis, grading, age, and site proved significant for prognosis.
HFRT, despite the high total dose adopted, did not change the prognosis of childhood ependymoma as compared to historical series: New radiotherapeutic approaches are needed to improve local control. Future ependymoma strategies should consider grading when stratifying treatment indications.
设计了一种用于室管膜瘤的术后“基于分期”的方案。
给予儿童:(1)如果无疾病证据(NED)则进行局部超分割放疗(HFRT),或(2)对于残留疾病(ED),先进行4个疗程的VEC,然后进行HFRT。HFRT剂量为70.4 Gy(1.1 Gy/分次,每日两次);VEC由长春新碱1.5 mg/m²,每周1次,依托泊苷100 mg/m²/天×3天,环磷酰胺3 g/m²,第1天组成。可行时,建议进行二次手术。
连续纳入63例儿童:46例NED,17例ED;肿瘤位于幕下47例,幕上16例,1例有脊髓转移。在NED患者中,46例中有35例接受了HFRT治疗;8例接受了常规分割放疗,3例未接受治疗。在17例ED患者中,9例接受了VEC+HFRT;因术后并发症导致的方案违背情况如下:仅HFRT(2例),常规分割放疗(3例)+VEC(2例),未治疗(1例)。VEC的客观缓解率为54%;放疗的客观缓解率为75%。63例儿童的5年总生存率和无进展生存率分别为75%和56%;NED亚组分别为82%和65%;ED亚组分别为61%和35%。所有组织学类型均进行了中心复审。多因素分析显示,分级、年龄和部位对预后有显著影响。
尽管采用了高总剂量,但与历史系列相比,HFRT并未改变儿童室管膜瘤的预后:需要新的放射治疗方法来改善局部控制。未来室管膜瘤的治疗策略在分层治疗指征时应考虑分级。