Agaoglu Fulya Yaman, Ayan Inci, Dizdar Yavuz, Kebudi Rejin, Gorgun Omer, Darendeliler Emin
Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul University-Istanbul Medical Faculty, 34390 Capa Istanbul, Turkey.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005 Sep;45(3):298-303. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20212.
Ependymal tumors are classified as ependymoma (benign or low grade) versus anaplastic ependymoma (malignant or high grade). Ependymomas represent 5-10% of intracranial neoplasm in children. In this study, demographic data and the treatment results of pediatric patients with ependymal tumors, treated in a single institute, is reported.
Between 1989 and 2001, 40 (22 M/18 F) previously untreated patients with a median age of 5.5 years (3 months-15 years), of histologically proven ependymal tumors (except ependymoblastomas) were referred to the Institute of Oncology, University of Istanbul. The localization was supratentorial in 18, infratentorial in 20, both supra and infratentorial in two patients. Histologic subgroups were 18 ependymomas (43.6%), and 22 anaplastic ependymomas (56.4%). Total tumor resection was performed in 20 patients (50%), subtotal in 18 patients (45%), and biopsy only in 2 patients (5%). Postoperative treatment consisted of regional (8 patients) or craniospinal (CSI) (9 patients) radiotherapy (RT) in patients with ependymoma; regional (7 patients) or CSI RT (14 patients) with chemotherapy (ChT) in patients with anaplastic ependymoma; ChT only (1 patient) in patients less than 3 years of age. The standard technique for posterior fossa irradiation was parallel-opposed lateral fields and total dose was 45-54 Gy. Between September 1989 and May 1991 patients received regimen A, which consisted of RT followed by eight-in-one ChT, given every 4 weeks for eight courses. Patients who were treated between June 1991 and July 1994, received regimen B, which included two courses of postoperative "VEC" (vincristine, etoposide, cisplatin) ChT, administered every 3 weeks, followed by RT applied with low dose concomitant cisplatin used as a radiosensitizer. Patients with objective response to postoperative "VEC" continued to have "VEC" after completion of RT for six more courses. From August 1994 on, patients received regimen C, consisting of RT and concomitant infusion of cisplatin followed by "VCPCU" (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, procarbazine, lomustine) administered every 4 weeks for eight courses.
A total of 40 patients were included in the outcome and survival data. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 64.9%, and the 5-year progression-free survival rate was 50.8% for the whole series. Median time for progression or relapse was 24.3 months and there were 19 patients (43.6%) with relapse or progression. Non-metastatic patients (P = 0.0008, 5-year OS rate was 82% vs. 29%), and totally resected patients (P = 0.01, 5-year OS rate was 80% vs. 55%), and > or =3 years of age (P = 0.04, 5-year OS rate was 75% vs. 38%) had significantly better outcome.
The majority of complete responders were patients who had total tumor removal. Treatment failure occurred mainly within the first 2 years, and outcome was dismal for patients who relapsed or had progressive disease. The median age at diagnosis is 6 years in our patient group; younger children (less than 3 years old) have less favorable outcome. There was no significant difference in survival or progression-free survival between the two histologic subtypes.
室管膜瘤分为室管膜瘤(良性或低级别)和间变性室管膜瘤(恶性或高级别)。室管膜瘤占儿童颅内肿瘤的5%-10%。本研究报告了在单一机构接受治疗的儿童室管膜瘤患者的人口统计学数据和治疗结果。
1989年至2001年间,40例(22例男性/18例女性)年龄中位数为5.5岁(3个月至15岁)、经组织学证实为室管膜瘤(不包括室管膜母细胞瘤)的未经治疗患者被转诊至伊斯坦布尔大学肿瘤研究所。肿瘤位于幕上18例,幕下20例,幕上和幕下均有2例。组织学亚组包括18例室管膜瘤(43.6%)和22例间变性室管膜瘤(56.4%)。20例患者(50%)行肿瘤全切,18例患者(45%)行次全切,仅2例患者(5%)行活检。室管膜瘤患者术后治疗包括局部放疗(8例)或全脑全脊髓放疗(CSI)(9例);间变性室管膜瘤患者术后治疗包括局部放疗(7例)或CSI放疗(14例)联合化疗(ChT);3岁以下患者仅行化疗(1例)。后颅窝照射的标准技术为平行相对侧野,总剂量为45-54 Gy。1989年9月至1991年5月期间的患者接受方案A,包括放疗后每4周进行8个疗程的八合一化疗。1991年6月至1994年7月期间接受治疗的患者接受方案B,包括术后两个疗程的“VEC”(长春新碱、依托泊苷、顺铂)化疗,每3周给药一次,随后进行低剂量顺铂同步放疗作为放射增敏剂。对术后“VEC”有客观反应的患者在放疗完成后继续进行6个疗程的“VEC”化疗。从1994年8月起,患者接受方案C,包括放疗和顺铂同步输注,随后每4周进行8个疗程的“VCPCU”(长春新碱、环磷酰胺、丙卡巴肼、洛莫司汀)化疗。
共有40例患者纳入结局和生存数据。整个系列的5年总生存率(OS)为64.9%,5年无进展生存率为50.8%。进展或复发的中位时间为24.3个月,有19例患者(43.6%)复发或进展。非转移性患者(P = 0.0008,5年OS率为82%对29%)、全切患者(P = 0.01,5年OS率为80%对55%)以及年龄≥3岁患者(P = 0.04,5年OS率为75%对38%)的结局明显更好。
大多数完全缓解者是肿瘤全切的患者。治疗失败主要发生在头2年内,复发或病情进展的患者结局不佳。我们患者组的诊断中位年龄为6岁;年龄较小的儿童(小于3岁)结局较差。两种组织学亚型在生存或无进展生存方面无显著差异。