Suppr超能文献

静脉注射吗啡与口服每日吗啡剂量按固定比例用于发作性(突破性)疼痛的安全性和有效性。

Safety and effectiveness of intravenous morphine for episodic (breakthrough) pain using a fixed ratio with the oral daily morphine dose.

作者信息

Mercadante Sebastiano, Villari Patrizia, Ferrera Patrizia, Bianchi Mauro, Casuccio Alessandra

机构信息

Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Pain Relief and Palliative Care Unit, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004 Apr;27(4):352-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2003.09.006.

Abstract

Breakthrough pain is normally severe in intensity and has a rapid onset. The availability of supplemental doses of opioids (rescue medication) in addition to the continuous analgesic medication is the main treatment suggested to manage these pain flares. The intravenous (i.v.) route may provide analgesia fast enough, but has never been assessed in clinical studies. The aim of this open-label study was to verify the safety and effectiveness of an i.v. dose equal to one-fifth the calculated equianalgesic total daily dose in advanced cancer patients with episodic pain. A consecutive sample of 48 cancer patients treated with oral morphine, who reported an acceptable basal analgesia and reported episodic pains, were selected for the study. The intravenous dose of morphine was one-fifth of the oral daily dose, converted into an i.v. dose using an equianalgesic ratio of 1/3 (i.v./oral). Written orders were given and intravenous morphine (i.v.-M) was administered by nurses. For each episode, pain intensity and opioid-related symptoms were recorded at the start (T0), after achieving maximum pain relief (T1), and one hour after (T2). In five patients, blood samples were taken at the time intervals described for measuring plasma concentrations of morphine and related glucuronated metabolites. One hundred seventy-one breakthrough pains were recorded during admission. In 162 episodes, a reduction of pain intensity of more than 33% was obtained within a mean of 17.7 minutes, from a mean intensity of 7.9 (on a 0-10 numeric scale) to 3. One hundred thirty-six episodes had more than a 50% pain intensity decrease after the i.v.-M within a mean of 16.6 minutes, from a pain intensity of 7.9 to 2.6. No differences in age, sex, pain mechanism, and time of events were found. There was a trend but no statistically significant differences between the groups receiving different basal doses and time to reach the maximum effect. Twenty episodes in ten patients required an additional dose within 2 hours. Adverse effects were uncommon and were significantly related to the basal dose, and as a consequence, with the i.v.-M dose. Morphine concentration significantly increased at the time of pain intensity reduction, and then decreased. These observations suggest that i.v.-M at a dose equivalent to 20% of the basal oral dosage is safe and effective in the majority of patients experiencing pain exacerbation. This treatment is inexpensive and can be used at little risk to patients.

摘要

爆发性疼痛通常强度剧烈且起病迅速。除持续使用镇痛药物外,提供补充剂量的阿片类药物(解救药物)是建议用于处理这些疼痛发作的主要治疗方法。静脉注射(i.v.)途径可能提供足够快的镇痛效果,但从未在临床研究中进行过评估。这项开放标签研究的目的是验证在患有发作性疼痛的晚期癌症患者中,静脉注射剂量等于计算出的等效镇痛每日总剂量五分之一的安全性和有效性。连续选取48例接受口服吗啡治疗、报告基础镇痛可接受且有发作性疼痛的癌症患者进行研究。静脉注射吗啡的剂量为口服每日剂量的五分之一,使用1/3(静脉注射/口服)的等效镇痛比换算为静脉注射剂量。下达书面医嘱,由护士给予静脉注射吗啡(i.v.-M)。对于每一次发作,在开始时(T0)、达到最大疼痛缓解后(T1)以及一小时后(T2)记录疼痛强度和阿片类药物相关症状。在5例患者中,按照所述时间间隔采集血样以测量吗啡及其相关葡萄糖醛酸化代谢物的血浆浓度。入院期间记录到171次爆发性疼痛。在162次发作中,平均17.7分钟内疼痛强度降低超过33%,从平均强度7.9(0至10数字评分量表)降至3。136次发作在静脉注射吗啡后平均16.6分钟内疼痛强度降低超过50%,从疼痛强度7.9降至2.6。在年龄、性别、疼痛机制和事件发生时间方面未发现差异。接受不同基础剂量的组之间以及达到最大效果的时间之间存在一种趋势,但无统计学显著差异。10例患者中的20次发作在2小时内需要额外剂量。不良反应不常见,且与基础剂量显著相关,因此也与静脉注射吗啡剂量相关。在疼痛强度降低时吗啡浓度显著升高,然后降低。这些观察结果表明,静脉注射吗啡剂量相当于基础口服剂量的20%对大多数经历疼痛加剧的患者是安全有效的。这种治疗成本低廉,对患者风险很小。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验