MacKelvie Kerry J, Petit Moira A, Khan Karim M, Beck Thomas J, McKay Heather A
BC Children's Hospital and Food, Nutrition and Health, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Bone. 2004 Apr;34(4):755-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2003.12.017.
Exercise during growth has a positive influence on bone mineral accrual, yet little is known about how bone geometry and strength adapt to loading during growth. Our primary objective was to compare changes in proximal femur bone geometry and strength between 31 prepubertal (Tanner Stage 1) boys who participated in a school-based, high-impact circuit intervention (12 min, three times a week) for 20 months and 33 maturity-matched controls. Our secondary objective was to compare changes in total body (TB), proximal femur (PF), and lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral content (BMC) and bone area (BA) in these groups. We assessed geometric variables and bone strength at the narrow neck (NN), intertrochanteric (TR) region, and femoral shaft regions by applying the Hip Structure Analysis program to proximal femur dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scans (DXA, Hologic QDR 4500). Further, we assessed total body, lumbar spine, and proximal femur BMC and BA by DXA and derived total body lean mass and fat mass from total body scans. Intervention (10.2 +/- 0.5 years) and control boys (10.1 +/- 0.5 years) had similar baseline height (140.8 vs. 141.3 cm) and weight (36.9 vs. 35.4 kg), and average 20-month physical activity scores (Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children, PAQ-C) and calcium intakes (861 vs. 852 mg/day, food frequency questionnaire). Twenty-month height and weight changes were not significantly different between groups; lean mass changed more (P < 0.05) in intervention boys (22.8%) than control boys (18.6%). At the NN region, intervention boys had greater bone expansion on both the periosteal (+2.6%, P = 0.1) and endosteal (+2.7%, P = 0.2) surfaces, resulting in significantly greater changes in section modulus (bone bending strength) (+7.5%, P = 0.02, ANCOVA, adjusting for height change, final Tanner Stage, and baseline bone values). Changes at the intertrochanteric and femoral shaft regions were not significantly different between groups. Femoral neck (FN) BMC changes were significantly greater in intervention boys (+4.3%, P < 0.01); changes in BA and BMC for other regions were not significantly different between groups. In summary, a school-based, high-impact exercise intervention implemented three times a week for 12 min is an effective strategy for site-specific gains in bone strength at the narrow neck region of the proximal femur.
生长期间进行锻炼对骨矿物质积累有积极影响,但对于骨骼几何结构和强度在生长过程中如何适应负荷却知之甚少。我们的主要目标是比较31名青春期前(坦纳1期)男孩与33名年龄匹配的对照组男孩近端股骨的骨骼几何结构和强度变化。这些青春期前男孩参加了一项为期20个月、以学校为基础的高冲击循环干预(12分钟,每周三次)。我们的次要目标是比较这些组中全身(TB)、近端股骨(PF)和腰椎(LS)的骨矿物质含量(BMC)和骨面积(BA)的变化。我们通过对近端股骨双能X线吸收测定扫描(DXA,Hologic QDR 4500)应用髋部结构分析程序,评估了窄颈(NN)、转子间(TR)区域和股骨干区域的几何变量和骨强度。此外,我们通过DXA评估了全身、腰椎和近端股骨的BMC和BA,并从全身扫描中得出全身瘦体重和脂肪量。干预组男孩(10.2±0.5岁)和对照组男孩(10.1±0.5岁)的基线身高(140.8 vs. 141.3厘米)和体重(36.9 vs. 35.4千克)相似,20个月的平均身体活动得分(儿童身体活动问卷,PAQ-C)和钙摄入量(861 vs. 852毫克/天,食物频率问卷)也相似。两组之间20个月的身高和体重变化无显著差异;干预组男孩的瘦体重变化(22.8%)比对照组男孩(18.6%)更大(P<0.05)。在NN区域,干预组男孩的骨膜表面(+2.6%,P = 0.1)和内膜表面(+2.7%,P = 0.2)的骨扩张更大,导致截面模量(骨弯曲强度)的变化显著更大(+7.5%,P = 0.02,协方差分析,校正身高变化、最终坦纳阶段和基线骨值)。两组之间转子间和股骨干区域的变化无显著差异。干预组男孩的股骨颈(FN)BMC变化显著更大(+4.3%,P<0.01);其他区域的BA和BMC变化在两组之间无显著差异。总之,一项以学校为基础、每周进行三次、每次12分钟的高冲击运动干预是在近端股骨窄颈区域实现特定部位骨强度增加的有效策略。