Reynolds Steven J, Shepherd Mary E, Risbud Arun R, Gangakhedkar Raman R, Brookmeyer Ronald S, Divekar Anand D, Mehendale Sanjay M, Bollinger Robert C
Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University Medical School, Ross 1150, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Lancet. 2004 Mar 27;363(9414):1039-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15840-6.
Circumcised men have a lower risk of HIV-1 infection than uncircumcised men. Laboratory findings suggest that the foreskin is enriched with HIV-1 target cells. However, some data suggest that circumcision could simply be a marker for low-risk behaviours. In a prospective study of 2298 HIV-uninfected men attending sexually transmitted infection clinics in India, we noted that circumcision was strongly protective against HIV-1 infection (adjusted relative risk 0.15; 95% CI 0.04-0.62; p=0.0089); however, we noted no protective effect against herpes simplex virus type 2, syphilis, or gonorrhoea. The specificity of this relation suggests a biological rather than behavioural explanation for the protective effect of male circumcision against HIV-1.
包皮环切术男性感染HIV-1的风险低于未行包皮环切术的男性。实验室研究结果表明,包皮富含HIV-1靶细胞。然而,一些数据表明,包皮环切术可能仅仅是低风险行为的一个标志。在一项对2298名在印度性传播感染诊所就诊的未感染HIV男性的前瞻性研究中,我们注意到包皮环切术对HIV-1感染具有很强的保护作用(调整后的相对风险为0.15;95%可信区间为0.04-0.62;p=0.0089);然而,我们未发现其对2型单纯疱疹病毒、梅毒或淋病有保护作用。这种关系的特异性表明,男性包皮环切术对HIV-1的保护作用是生物学原因而非行为原因。