• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The reasonable woman standard: effects on sexual harassment court decisions.

作者信息

Perry Elissa L, Kulik Carol T, Bourhis Anne C

机构信息

Teachers College. Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.

出版信息

Law Hum Behav. 2004 Feb;28(1):9-27. doi: 10.1023/b:lahu.0000015001.07732.8e.

DOI:10.1023/b:lahu.0000015001.07732.8e
PMID:15055339
Abstract

Some federal courts have used a reasonable woman standard rather than the traditional reasonable man or reasonable person standard to determine whether hostile environment sexual harassment has occurred. The current research examined the impact of the reasonable woman standard on federal district court decisions, controlling for other factors found to affect sexual harassment court decisions. Results indicated that there was a weak relationship between whether a case followed a reasonable woman precedent-setting case and the likelihood that the court decision favored the plaintiff. The implications of our findings for individuals and organizations involved in sexual harassment claims are discussed.

摘要

相似文献

1
The reasonable woman standard: effects on sexual harassment court decisions.
Law Hum Behav. 2004 Feb;28(1):9-27. doi: 10.1023/b:lahu.0000015001.07732.8e.
2
Here comes the judge: the influence of judge personal characteristics on federal sexual harassment case outcomes.法官登场:法官个人特征对联邦性骚扰案件结果的影响
Law Hum Behav. 2003 Feb;27(1):69-86. doi: 10.1023/a:1021678912133.
3
Perceptions of sexual harassment: the effects of gender, legal standard, and ambivalent sexism.对性骚扰的认知:性别、法律标准及矛盾性性别歧视的影响
Law Hum Behav. 1997 Feb;21(1):71-93. doi: 10.1023/a:1024818110678.
4
Selective sexual harassment: differential treatment of similar groups of women workers.选择性性骚扰:对类似女性工人群体的差别对待。
Law Hum Behav. 2004 Feb;28(1):29-45. doi: 10.1023/b:lahu.0000015002.56564.8e.
5
The effects of prior workplace behavior on subsequent sexual harassment judgments.先前工作场所行为对后续性骚扰判断的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2004 Feb;28(1):47-67. doi: 10.1023/b:lahu.0000015003.72223.63.
6
Explaining sexual harassment judgments: looking beyond gender of the rater.
Law Hum Behav. 2004 Feb;28(1):69-95. doi: 10.1023/b:lahu.0000015004.39462.6e.
7
The reasonable woman standard: a meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment.合理女性标准:对性骚扰认知中性别差异的元分析综述
Law Hum Behav. 1998 Feb;22(1):33-57. doi: 10.1023/a:1025724721559.
8
Sexual harassment stories: testing a story-mediated model of juror decision-making in civil litigation.
Law Hum Behav. 2003 Feb;27(1):29-51. doi: 10.1023/a:1021674811225.
9
Sexual harassment: the "reasonable person" vs "reasonable woman" standards have not been resolved.性骚扰:“理性人”标准与“理性女性”标准的问题尚未得到解决。
Psychol Rep. 1996 Feb;78(1):329-30. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1996.78.1.329.
10
Gender influence on perceptions of hostile environment sexual harassment.性别对敌意环境性骚扰认知的影响。
Psychol Rep. 1995 Aug;77(1):79-82. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.77.1.79.

引用本文的文献

1
#Metoo or #Hertoo? A Moderated Mediation Model of Gender Differences in Perceptions of Sexual Harassment.#我也是(#MeToo)还是#她也是(#HerToo)?性别差异感知性骚扰的中介调节模型。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Aug;51(6):3105-3120. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02344-1. Epub 2022 Jul 20.