Baird C L, Bensko N L, Bell P A, Viney W, Woody W D
Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523, USA.
Psychol Rep. 1995 Aug;77(1):79-82. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.77.1.79.
Perceptions of sexual harassment were investigated as a function of perpetrators' and recipients' gender. Undergraduate students (100 women, 98 men) were presented 34 scenarios of men and women interacting at work. Participants were asked to read carefully each scenario and indicate on a scale anchored by 1 (strongly disagree) and 7 (strongly agree) their opinions as to whether the scenario represented an incident of sexual harassment. Analysis indicated that women rated "hostile environment" scenarios as more harassing than men, and male perpetrators were rated as more harassing than female perpetrators. Even though some scenarios were rated as more harassing than others, the full range of the 7-point scale was used on every scenario, indicating a lack of agreement on what constitutes harassment. This lack of agreement highlights the debate within the legal community about whether the "reasonable person" or the "reasonable woman" standard should be used to judge sexual harassment in the workplace.
对性骚扰的认知作为施害者和受害者性别的一项函数进行了调查。向本科生（100名女性，98名男性）展示了34个男女在工作中互动的场景。要求参与者仔细阅读每个场景，并在从1（强烈不同意）到7（强烈同意）的量表上表明他们对于该场景是否代表一起性骚扰事件的看法。分析表明，女性认为“恶劣环境”场景比男性更具骚扰性，并且男性施害者比女性施害者被认为更具骚扰性。尽管有些场景被认为比其他场景更具骚扰性，但每个场景都使用了完整的7分量表，这表明在什么构成骚扰方面缺乏共识。这种缺乏共识凸显了法律界内部关于应使用“理性人”还是“理性女性”标准来判断职场性骚扰的争论。
