Britt H, Harris M, Driver B, Bridges-Webb C, O'Toole B, Neary S
Department of Community Medicine, University of Sydney, Croydon, NSW, Australia.
Fam Pract. 1992 Jun;9(2):191-4. doi: 10.1093/fampra/9.2.191.
This study of 521 encounters in 25 urban general practices in Australia, compares both patient and doctor reported reasons for encounter (RFE) and diagnoses. Although doctors and their patients generally agreed on the overall distribution of RFE and diagnoses that arose, there was disagreement in at least 30% of paired comparisons within individual encounters. There was better agreement for RFE than for diagnoses. This may have been partly due to differences in the classification systems used. However, it suggests that diagnoses recalled by patients at later household interview are at best only a rough approximation of the diagnoses recorded by the doctor. These findings are important both for patient care and for the conduct of general practice morbidity research.
这项针对澳大利亚25家城市全科诊所的521次诊疗的研究,比较了患者和医生报告的就诊原因(RFE)及诊断结果。尽管医生及其患者在出现的RFE和诊断结果的总体分布上通常意见一致,但在个体诊疗中的至少30%的配对比较中存在分歧。RFE的一致性比诊断结果更好。这可能部分归因于所使用的分类系统的差异。然而,这表明患者在后续家庭访谈中回忆起的诊断结果充其量只是医生记录的诊断结果的大致近似值。这些发现对于患者护理和全科医疗发病率研究的开展都很重要。